To celebrate the release of GATK 4.0, we are giving away free credits for running the GATK4 Best Practices pipelines in FireCloud, our secure online analysis portal. It’s first come first serve, so sign up now to claim your free credits worth $250. Sponsored by Google Cloud. Learn more at

CNV length - by genome, by region

redzengenoistredzengenoist Member
edited April 2013 in Ask the GATK team

Hello Geraldine et al,

I've a question about CNV calling, which you might or might have an answer for. We're doing a case/control analysis on two cohorts, and one of the analyses we'd like to carry out is an examination of CNV length - one thing we want to do is analyse by genome (average site above/below average, say), and by region (same general idea).

While calling SNPs and indels seems straightforward enough with UG, I wonder if you have a best practice for calling CNV - or rather, a candidate for what might become an integrated best practice? Maybe I can even help with maturation/integration.

Thanks for your relentless work on the site, tools and community, this is the place to be.


Best Answer


  • redzengenoistredzengenoist Member
    edited April 2013

    I should have added one more important piece of information:

    I am right now experimenting with XHMM. I am not yet sure whether it is the way to go, since it's a tool for highly covered target regions, while our data is low coverage WGS. We'd optimally like to do a very large number of regions, though a handful of target regions would be acceptable.

  • I'll do that, thanks Geraldine.

Sign In or Register to comment.