Notice:
If you happen to see a question you know the answer to, please do chime in and help your fellow community members. We encourage our fourm members to be more involved, jump in and help out your fellow researchers with their questions. GATK forum is a community forum and helping each other with using GATK tools and research is the cornerstone of our success as a genomics research community.We appreciate your help!

Test-drive the GATK tools and Best Practices pipelines on Terra


Check out this blog post to learn how you can get started with GATK and try out the pipelines in preconfigured workspaces (with a user-friendly interface!) without having to install anything.
Attention:
We will be out of the office on October 14, 2019, due to the U.S. holiday. We will return to monitoring the forum on October 15.

Using HaplotypeCaller 3.5 vs HaplotypeCaller 4.0 joint calling large cohorts

We've been testing published Broad "production" workflow for paired-end single sample alignment and variant calling github.com/gatk-workflows/gatk4-germline-snps-indels ("paired-end single sample alignment and variant calling"). The workflow in the "production" pipeline appears to use HaplotypeCaller from GATK 3.5 while using other components from GATK 4. There is a separately published pipeline here github.com/gatk-workflows/gatk4-germline-snps-indels that uses GATK 4's HaplotypeCaller. We have tried running the joint discovery pipeline using both the HC 3.5 and HC 4 gvcfs as inputs, using the default parameters provided in the repositories. However, the results appear to be almost indistinguishable when run on the NIST NA12878 reference sample. This surprised us since the model/parameters have changed between 3.5 and 4.

Question: Why is the Broad "production" pipeline still using HaplotypeCaller 3.5 instead of some 4.x version?
Question:
We intend to align and joint-call upwards of 8000 WGS samples on Google Cloud It it recommended to use the output from HaplotypeCaller 3.5 (we were trying to use the Broad "production" pipeline with as few modifications as possible) or to use Haplotypecaller 4 instead before running joint calling?

Best Answers

Answers

Sign In or Register to comment.