If you happen to see a question you know the answer to, please do chime in and help your fellow community members. We encourage our fourm members to be more involved, jump in and help out your fellow researchers with their questions. GATK forum is a community forum and helping each other with using GATK tools and research is the cornerstone of our success as a genomics research community.We appreciate your help!
Test-drive the GATK tools and Best Practices pipelines on Terra
Check out this blog post to learn how you can get started with GATK and try out the pipelines in preconfigured workspaces (with a user-friendly interface!) without having to install anything.
Interpreting ExcessHet INFO field
First thanks for the wonderful help and clarity of explanations on this website.
I am considering applying a filter on ExcessHet on my vcf files to have only markers that follow HWE. I understood that the ExcessHet value was the probability of getting the same or more heterozygotes as was observed unde HW conditions. But looking at my data, I get sites like this:
Scaffold_100 316384 . A C 1085470 PASS AC=55;AF=0.724;AN=76;BaseQRankSum=0.764;ClippingRankSum=0.00;DP=36981;ExcessHet=0.0000;FS=0.000;InbreedingCoeff=0.9342;MLEAC=55;MLEAF=0.724;MQ=57.15;MQRankSum=0.771;QD=29.50;ReadPosRankSum=0.118;SOR=1.517 GT:AD:DP:GQ:PL 1/1:1,120:121:99:4815,322,0 1/1:1,594:595:99:24888,1748,0 1/1:0,789:789:99:33158,2371,0 1/1:4,461:465:99:19229,1157,0 1/1:2,106:108:99:4322,245,0 1/1:9,279:288:99:11278,484,0 1/1:1,265:266:99:10808,754,0 1/1:8,246:254:99:10149,462,0 1/1:5,293:298:99:12072,726,0 1/1:1,734:735:99:30363,2167,0 1/1:9,302:311:99:12455,568,0
Where ExcessHet is 0 but the site is monomorphic for the alternate allele, so following the null hypothesis of HWE there should be no heterozygote, as observed, and I should get a high p-value?
Did I misinterpret something there?
As a result I am not so sure how to apply the filter...