If you happen to see a question you know the answer to, please do chime in and help your fellow community members. We appreciate your help!
Test-drive the GATK tools and Best Practices pipelines on Terra
Check out this blog post to learn how you can get started with GATK and try out the pipelines in preconfigured workspaces (with a user-friendly interface!) without having to install anything.
Mutect2 output not match to real situation
I used Mutect2 to call variants on a pair of tumor and normal samples. One variant "PASS" the filter is shown below:
4 6956086 . C CTTTCTTGCT . PASS ECNT=1;HCNT=34;MAX_ED=.;MIN_ED=.;NLOD=54.49;RPA=1,2;RU=TTTCTTGCT;STR;TLOD=17.08 GT:AD:AF:ALT_F1R2:ALT_F2R1:FOXOG:QSS:REF_F1R2:REF_F2R1 0/0:543,19:4.673e-03:0:0:.:9520,0:163:122
To my limited understanding of Mutect2 output, I think passing the filter means that "CTTTCTTGCT" is in tumor, not normal. I am trying to locate this small insertion event, and I attached an screenshot of the BQSR bam file, with the variant in the middle of the sequence. Here is one read I got from the tumor sample's sam file. Overall, there is a C to T mutation, which also occurs in the normal sample (not shown), but I do not see this insertion when comparing to the reference
ST-E00545:65:HJLYWALXX:7:1221:18061:39844 83 4 6956047 60 150M = 6955995 -202 CGCTCCTGTTCATGGACAGGTTTGTGGCTGCTTTCTTGCTTTTCTTGCTGTTGGAACTGGAGACTTAACTGGAAGCAGAGTCTTTCCTGCGTGTAGCTTTGACAGCATGTGACCGTCGGCCTTGGTTGGGCTGAGGTGTTTCTGTGGGTC JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJFFFAA NM:i:1 MD:Z:39C110 AS:i:145 XS:i:22 RG:Z:032017
The reference around chr4 6956096 is "CTTTCTTGCCTTTCTTGCT".
I am new to Mutect2 so I want to confirm with you experts about this. I understand that MuTect2 is still in beta testing stage, but I would really appreciate your advice. Thanks a lot!