Heads up:
We’re moving the GATK website, docs and forum to a new platform. Read the full story and breakdown of key changes on this blog.
If you happen to see a question you know the answer to, please do chime in and help your fellow community members. We encourage our fourm members to be more involved, jump in and help out your fellow researchers with their questions. GATK forum is a community forum and helping each other with using GATK tools and research is the cornerstone of our success as a genomics research community.We appreciate your help!

Test-drive the GATK tools and Best Practices pipelines on Terra

Check out this blog post to learn how you can get started with GATK and try out the pipelines in preconfigured workspaces (with a user-friendly interface!) without having to install anything.
We will be out of the office for a Broad Institute event from Dec 10th to Dec 11th 2019. We will be back to monitor the GATK forum on Dec 12th 2019. In the meantime we encourage you to help out other community members with their queries.
Thank you for your patience!

VariantAnnotator doesn't annotate Coverage at every call

apolyakapolyak State College, PA, USAMember

Some calls I don't see allele depth (AD), for some I don't see depth (DP), and for some I see neither. Are there scenarios where GATK cannot annotate these?


  • SheilaSheila Broad InstituteMember, Broadie admin


    Can you please tell us the exact command you ran and the version of GATK you are using?


  • apolyakapolyak State College, PA, USAMember
    edited January 2016

    I'm using GATK 3.3, and was hoping to not upgrade as that would take a lot of time to rerun the entire pipeline (unless doing so wouldn't be required).

    This is the command:

    java -Xmx10g -jar $GATKDIR/GenomeAnalysisTK.jar \
     -R $REF \
     -T VariantAnnotator \
     -nt 6 \
     -I sample1.bam \
     -I sample2.bam \
     -I sample3.bam \
     -I sample4.bam \
     -I sample5.bam \
     -I sample6.bam \
     -I sample7.bam \
     -I sample8.bam \
     -A DepthPerAlleleBySample \
     -A Coverage \
     -V all_samples.vcf \
     -L all_samples_annotated.vcf \
     -o PSU001_annotated.vcf

    And it outputs a file with some calls such as:

    chr1    15118   .       A       G       5277.48 VQSRTrancheSNP99.90to100.00     AB=0.256231;ABP=520.702;AC=10;AF=0.385;AN=26;AO=269;BVAR;BaseQRankSum=5.29;CIGAR=1X;DP=3130;DPB=1321;DPRA=0.776693;EPP=196.949;EPPR=1014.46;FS=3.239;GQ_MEAN=374.85;GQ_STDDEV=354.90;GTI=1;InbreedingCoeff=-0.6774;LEN=1;MEANALT=1.91667;MLEAC=11;MLEAF=0.423;MQ=26.67;MQ0=0;MQM=10.7063;MQMR=11.4812;MQRankSum=0.171;NCC=0;NS=13;NUMALT=1;ODDS=6.5679;PAIRED=1;PAIREDR=1;PAO=0;PQA=0;PQR=0;PRO=0;QA=8632;QD=4.76;QR=26423;RO=1037;RPP=519.716;RPPR=1969.19;RUN=1;ReadPosRankSum=1.14;SAF=51;SAP=228.141;SAR=218;SOR=0.396;SRF=147;SRP=1159;SRR=890;TYPE=snp;VQSLOD=-7.897e+00;culprit=MQ;dataset=Intersection;technology.illumina=1    GT:AD:DP:GQ:PL:TP
    0|1:216,32:.:99:229,0,3460:120  0/1:118,129:.:99:1286,0,906     0/1:214,35:.:82:82,0,2344       0/1:215,30:.:97:97,0,2678       0/0:249,0:86:99:0,120,1800      1|0:146,67:.:99:591,0,1221:120  0|0:245,2:66:99:0,120,1800:120  0/1:201,38:.:99:106,0,1954      0/1:96,103:.:99:1166,0,844      0/0:209,37:99:0:0,0,2313        0/1:185,60:.:99:1026,0,2202     0/1:197,48:.:99:300,0,2163      0/1:161,77:.:99:452,0,1539

    In this case, it's giving allele depth, but not depth. Shouldn't it also give a depth? Why is there a "." here instead of a depth?

    Post edited by apolyak on
  • Geraldine_VdAuweraGeraldine_VdAuwera Cambridge, MAMember, Administrator, Broadie admin

    I think this was a bug where specifying the Coverage annotation actually disabled it. Can you try running without specifying it?

  • apolyakapolyak State College, PA, USAMember

    Actually, one problem is that some calls have the depth annotation, and others have "." and others have no genotype DP annotation at all.

Sign In or Register to comment.