We’re moving the GATK website, docs and forum to a new platform. Read the full story and breakdown of key changes on this blog.
If you happen to see a question you know the answer to, please do chime in and help your fellow community members. We encourage our fourm members to be more involved, jump in and help out your fellow researchers with their questions. GATK forum is a community forum and helping each other with using GATK tools and research is the cornerstone of our success as a genomics research community.We appreciate your help!
Test-drive the GATK tools and Best Practices pipelines on Terra
Check out this blog post to learn how you can get started with GATK and try out the pipelines in preconfigured workspaces (with a user-friendly interface!) without having to install anything.
SV discovery batching
we've recently seen in a project of 96 samples (all ~30x) that we get a very broad range of number of calls per sample (~600-900 deletions from SVdiscovery, using only PASS calls and removing redundancies with 80% reciprocal overlap). If we only use the 30 most extreme samples (15 with highest, 15 with lowest number of calls), we get a much more homogeneous picture of 700-800 deletions per sample.
It appears that deletions that are confidently called in the batch of 30 samples are missing from the batch of 96 samples. To me this seems quite counter-intuitive, I would expect the number of SVs to increase when adding samples.
Looking into the VCF file, I see that some calls are filtered out through the DEPTH or COHERENCE filters, in some cases calls are PASS but the sample is not contained in the GSSAMPLES field, in other cases the SV is apparently not called at all. The second reason (not in GSSAMPLES) seems to be the most common one. Do you have an idea why that might be happening?
In general, given 30x WGS data, how many samples do you suggest to batch together?
Thanks a lot,