We’re moving the GATK website, docs and forum to a new platform. Read the full story and breakdown of key changes on this blog.
If you happen to see a question you know the answer to, please do chime in and help your fellow community members. We encourage our fourm members to be more involved, jump in and help out your fellow researchers with their questions. GATK forum is a community forum and helping each other with using GATK tools and research is the cornerstone of our success as a genomics research community.We appreciate your help!
Test-drive the GATK tools and Best Practices pipelines on Terra
Check out this blog post to learn how you can get started with GATK and try out the pipelines in preconfigured workspaces (with a user-friendly interface!) without having to install anything.
We will be out of the office for a Broad Institute event from Dec 10th to Dec 11th 2019. We will be back to monitor the GATK forum on Dec 12th 2019. In the meantime we encourage you to help out other community members with their queries.
Thank you for your patience!
Haplotype caller calling heterozygote with bad quality when it is Homozygote
Second question of the day, I am sorry.
I have been facing an issue that I saw many times on the forum but each time it seemed that you fixed it with new versions. Problem is I am using the very last version of GATK = 3.4 (downloaded yesterday).
I am using HaplotypeCaller single sample mode with all parameters by default as indicated in the "DNASeq" example in the HaplotypeCaller documentation page.
I have a problem with one variant rs206076 on BRCA2 chromosome 13 position 32915005. I have Sanger validation for this variant in all my samples and Unified Genotyper was calling it correctly.
Using HaplotypeCaller, there are some variants where the HOM call is made correctly and with very high quality (22 000) and others where HC calls the position as heterozygote with very low quality when it is obvious from IGV that the position is homozygote.
I put in the IGV screenshot on individual that fails (up) and the other that is ok (down).
I do have the same problem with another variant close to this one (not shown) whereas a couple of variants in between are called correctly in all samples.
Any idea about this issue ?
thanks a lot