Heads up:
We’re moving the GATK website, docs and forum to a new platform. Read the full story and breakdown of key changes on this blog.
If you happen to see a question you know the answer to, please do chime in and help your fellow community members. We encourage our fourm members to be more involved, jump in and help out your fellow researchers with their questions. GATK forum is a community forum and helping each other with using GATK tools and research is the cornerstone of our success as a genomics research community.We appreciate your help!

Test-drive the GATK tools and Best Practices pipelines on Terra

Check out this blog post to learn how you can get started with GATK and try out the pipelines in preconfigured workspaces (with a user-friendly interface!) without having to install anything.
We will be out of the office for a Broad Institute event from Dec 10th to Dec 11th 2019. We will be back to monitor the GATK forum on Dec 12th 2019. In the meantime we encourage you to help out other community members with their queries.
Thank you for your patience!

High Depth and GQ of 0

johnwallace123johnwallace123 Member ✭✭
edited October 2014 in Ask the GATK team

GATK Gurus,

I am attempting to get an "expected quality (GQ)" given a certain depth of coverage in a VCF file in order to quantify a rough minimum depth that will result in a usable variant call, and I noticed some odd behavior. In one of my variants, I have a depth of 601 (all referent), but the GQ is reported as 0. For a SNP, the PL is typically reported as "0,0,1000+". Below is a sample of the issue at 16:55862791 (note that the filter applied here is GQ>50):

Entry: 0/0:.:601,0:601:LowQualCall:0:0,0,13743
GVCF entry: ... T . . END=55862791 GT:DP:GQ:MIN_DP:PL 0/0:601:0:601:0,0,13743

For the record, I am using the HaplotypeCaller version 3.2-0 (calling GVCFs). If you need anything else from me to help diagnose the issue, please let me know.

-John Wallace

Post edited by Geraldine_VdAuwera on

Best Answer


Sign In or Register to comment.