We’re moving the GATK website, docs and forum to a new platform. Read the full story and breakdown of key changes on this blog.
If you happen to see a question you know the answer to, please do chime in and help your fellow community members. We encourage our fourm members to be more involved, jump in and help out your fellow researchers with their questions. GATK forum is a community forum and helping each other with using GATK tools and research is the cornerstone of our success as a genomics research community.We appreciate your help!
Test-drive the GATK tools and Best Practices pipelines on Terra
Check out this blog post to learn how you can get started with GATK and try out the pipelines in preconfigured workspaces (with a user-friendly interface!) without having to install anything.
HaplotypeCaller de-novo alignment discards reads
I am calling variants (SNPs and Indels) on WGS data. After JointGenotyping with g.vcf files I noticed that for some of the variants in the VCF file have a missing variant call (./.) despite having reads.
1.1 271087 . A T 6094.35 . AC=6;AF=1.00;AN=6;DP=190;ExcessHet=3.0103;FS=0.000;MLEAC=6;MLEAF=1.00;MQ=49.13;QD=28.12;SOR=0.820 GT:AD:DP:GQ:PGT:PID:PL ./.:50,0:50 1/1:0,46:46:99:1|1:271079_A_T:2205,147,0 1/1:0,29:29:87:1|1:271051_A_C:1305,87,0 1/1:0,57:57:99:1|1:271079_A_T:2610,175,0
1.1 271089 . A T 6004.35 . AC=6;AF=1.00;AN=6;DP=189;ExcessHet=3.0103;FS=0.000;MLEAC=6;MLEAF=1.00;MQ=49.07;QD=33.97;SOR=0.873 GT:AD:DP:GQ:PGT:PID:PL ./.:50,0:50 1/1:0,46:46:99:1|1:271079_A_T:2160,144,0 1/1:0,29:29:87:1|1:271051_A_C:1305,87,0 1/1:0,56:56:99:1|1:271079_A_T:2565,172,0
1.1 271091 . G A 5914.35 . AC=6;AF=1.00;AN=6;DP=188;ExcessHet=3.0103;FS=0.000;MLEAC=6;MLEAF=1.00;MQ=49.20;QD=33.36;SOR=0.908 GT:AD:DP:GQ:PGT:PID:PL ./.:49,0:49 1/1:0,47:47:99:1|1:271079_A_T:2115,141,0 1/1:0,28:28:87:1|1:271051_A_C:1305,87,0 1/1:0,56:56:99:1|1:271079_A_T:2520,169,0
When you view the region of interest (Chrom 1 270713-271756) in IGV, the original alignment (Top half of attached file) indicates that there are SNPs present, but the -bamout created from the HaplotypeCaller step seems to discard the reads (Bottom half of attached file). It only seems to do this for the one sample, the -bamout for the other 3 samples does not discard the reads and calls SNPs as indicated (See above vcf).
My question is, why is the re-alignment not consistent among the samples, and is there a way to adjust the GATK parameters so that it is not discarding reads? The subspecies I am working with are expected to have many variable sites compared to the reference genome and I do not want to discard SNPs of interest.