Hi GATK Users,

Happy Thanksgiving!
Our staff will be observing the holiday and will be unavailable from 22nd to 25th November. This will cause a delay in reaching out to you and answering your questions immediately. Rest assured we will get back to it on Monday November 26th. We are grateful for your support and patience.
Have a great holiday everyone!!!

Regards
GATK Staff

Somatic mutations of epithelial cells (HaplotypeCaller vs Mutect)

firadazerfiradazer United KingdomMember
edited February 2017 in Ask the GATK team

Hello, I'd like to extract somatic mutations from normal epithelial cells of cancer patients.

And it's confusing which tool to use. HaplotypeCaller or Mutect?

I know Mutect is for calling somatic mutations but the data is not about cancer cells.

Mutect is different from HaplotypeCaller because it is not based on diploid calculation.

Cancer cells are usually not diploid, so Mutect is useful in that case. (Is this correct?)

But I'm dealing with epithelial cells, so if reads don't show as diploid, then it's presumably sequencing error.

i.e.,
ref: A
reads: AAACCCGGG

In the case above, it seems like triploid, so Mutect will detect the base pair as somatic variant while HaplotypeCaller might not call it as a variant.

Again, I'm using normal epithelial cells, not cancer cells. So it should be diploid.

Should I use HaplotypeCaller or Mutect?

Do you also think that removing all the variants which already exist in dbsnp database from results of HaplotypeCaller is a correct process for getting somatic mutations from normal epithelial cells?

Issue · Github
by Sheila

Issue Number
1732
State
closed
Last Updated
Assignee
Array
Milestone
Array
Closed By
sooheelee

Best Answer

Answers

  • firadazerfiradazer United KingdomMember

    Thank you for your answer and the nice videos, shlee.

Sign In or Register to comment.