If you happen to see a question you know the answer to, please do chime in and help your fellow community members. We encourage our fourm members to be more involved, jump in and help out your fellow researchers with their questions. GATK forum is a community forum and helping each other with using GATK tools and research is the cornerstone of our success as a genomics research community.We appreciate your help!
Test-drive the GATK tools and Best Practices pipelines on Terra
Check out this blog post to learn how you can get started with GATK and try out the pipelines in preconfigured workspaces (with a user-friendly interface!) without having to install anything.
Mutect1.1.7 clustered position filter for soft-clipped reads
Please can you consult me.
I have an example of a candidate somatic variant where all variant reads are soft-clipped (3 bases from the mutation).
The variant is naturally rejected by Mutect when running with default parameters.
However, disabling clipread filter doesn't help and the failure reason is "clustered position".
So the question is: if the caller does not distinguish between the start/end of the read and the start/end of the alignment?
I got curious and will appreciate any input if some of you came across similar issues.
(PS. I do realize that aforementioned filters are generally reasonable and the reason I am experimenting is that the mutation in question is clinically relevant )