We’re moving the GATK website, docs and forum to a new platform. Read the full story and breakdown of key changes on this blog.
If you happen to see a question you know the answer to, please do chime in and help your fellow community members. We encourage our fourm members to be more involved, jump in and help out your fellow researchers with their questions. GATK forum is a community forum and helping each other with using GATK tools and research is the cornerstone of our success as a genomics research community.We appreciate your help!
Test-drive the GATK tools and Best Practices pipelines on Terra
Check out this blog post to learn how you can get started with GATK and try out the pipelines in preconfigured workspaces (with a user-friendly interface!) without having to install anything.
Contamination estimation while following the Best Practices workflow
I've started following the Best Practices guide to process >80 whole-genome samples (reference-confidence model workflow). During variant calling via HaplotypeCaller, a few of the gVCFs blew up in size (> 1TB, while the rest of gVCFs were around 75 GB). I suspect that these samples are contaminated. I'd like to:
1) Confirm that the samples that produced large gVCFs are contaminated
2) Check that the rest of the samples are unaffected (higher priority)
I've started looking at GATK-friendly ConTest . It seems that it requires genotyped VCF files as input. Is it appropriate to call GenotypeGVCFs individually for each gVCF and use the produced VCF as input for ConTest? Or can I use "raw" gVCFs?
I've also considered using cleanCall , but sounds like I'd need to repeat variant calling using samtools (took ages to produce gVCFs, so trying avoid this) or somehow do the gVCF -> VCF -> PED conversion.