We’re moving the GATK website, docs and forum to a new platform. Read the full story and breakdown of key changes on this blog.
If you happen to see a question you know the answer to, please do chime in and help your fellow community members. We encourage our fourm members to be more involved, jump in and help out your fellow researchers with their questions. GATK forum is a community forum and helping each other with using GATK tools and research is the cornerstone of our success as a genomics research community.We appreciate your help!
Test-drive the GATK tools and Best Practices pipelines on Terra
Check out this blog post to learn how you can get started with GATK and try out the pipelines in preconfigured workspaces (with a user-friendly interface!) without having to install anything.
Should I use dbSNP to model known variants in BQSR in a random mutagenesis project?
I am currently processing some aligned reads to discover novel variants from an ENU mutagenesis project. All the samples are Bl6 mice, with a few exceptions.
A previous forum has discussed about using BQSR on mice sequences (gatkforums.broadinstitute.org/gatk/discussion/1243/what-are-the-standard-resources-for-non-human-genomes). Moreover, there's a research paper that fed in dbSNP database into their BQSR algorithm for their ENU project (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4623266/.)
From what I understand about BQSR, the recalibration method considers variants not found in well annotated variants as "errors" (is this error modelling?). I'm just wondering for such a project where novel mutations are to be expected, one might overestimate the errors if one were to feed in known variants into the learning algorithm (especially if the mutation load is high)?
Thanks in advance