why sensitivity values are different in -T VariantEval and -T GenotypeConcordance output

Hi! I'd like to understand why I got different sensitivity values when comparing two sets of genotype calls using "GenotypeConcordance" and "VariantEva". I used a small testing dataset and noted the difference. The output from "GenotypeConcordance" run made sense to me. There were additional FN calls (CompPolyEvalNoCall) identified from "VairantEva" run were unexpected. I attach both outputs here. Thanks in advance for your help!

Answers

Sign In or Register to comment.