If you happen to see a question you know the answer to, please do chime in and help your fellow community members. We encourage our fourm members to be more involved, jump in and help out your fellow researchers with their questions. GATK forum is a community forum and helping each other with using GATK tools and research is the cornerstone of our success as a genomics research community.We appreciate your help!

Test-drive the GATK tools and Best Practices pipelines on Terra

Check out this blog post to learn how you can get started with GATK and try out the pipelines in preconfigured workspaces (with a user-friendly interface!) without having to install anything.

Missing data in HaplotypeCaller

digitonindigitonin Los AngelesMember

I have an issue with HaplotypeCaller and its use to call SNPs in RAD data.

I recently used HaplotypeCaller to call SNPs in 600 samples + 50 subspecies samples. Worked fine.
After adding more data to 1200 samples + 120 subspecies samples, ~100 of these subspecies results in 0 calls and just missing data "./." at these loci. Recall that some of these samples and sites were analyzed and called in the first analysis. Any ideas why?

My setup:
~1200 Read Reduced bam files
Merged into 1 bam file with proper RG headers.
Should I not have merged? Should I not have Reduced Reads?




  • Geraldine_VdAuweraGeraldine_VdAuwera Cambridge, MAMember, Administrator, Broadie admin

    Hi there,

    Merging and reducing should not have any effect on the calling, so I wonder if there's something else going on. Try running HC on the unmerged files over one of the intervals where you're seeing missing calls. See if you get your calls then.

    Also, can you confirm that all of your samples were processed with the same version of GATK at every step?

  • digitonindigitonin Los AngelesMember

    Yes, I can confirm that the same version 2.7-2 was used everywhere.

    I have been able to call SNPs in all samples using a pre-BQSR non-Read-Reduced merged bam. I am now trying this on a pre-BQSR Read Reduced merged bam (since the earlier was taking too long).

    I have a feeling it has something to do with the BQSR. I will try calling SNPs post-BQSR to confirm this and will repost when I know more.

  • Geraldine_VdAuweraGeraldine_VdAuwera Cambridge, MAMember, Administrator, Broadie admin

    OK, keep me posted. If you find evidence of a bug we'll need a data snippet that reproduces the error with the latest version. Good luck!

Sign In or Register to comment.