The current GATK version is 3.8-0
Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Get notifications!

You can opt in to receive email notifications, for example when your questions get answered or when there are new announcements, by following the instructions given here.

Got a problem?

1. Search using the upper-right search box, e.g. using the error message.
2. Try the latest version of tools.
3. Include tool and Java versions.
4. Tell us whether you are following GATK Best Practices.
5. Include relevant details, e.g. platform, DNA- or RNA-Seq, WES (+capture kit) or WGS (PCR-free or PCR+), paired- or single-end, read length, expected average coverage, somatic data, etc.
6. For tool errors, include the error stacktrace as well as the exact command.
7. For format issues, include the result of running ValidateSamFile for BAMs or ValidateVariants for VCFs.
8. For weird results, include an illustrative example, e.g. attach IGV screenshots according to Article#5484.
9. For a seeming variant that is uncalled, include results of following Article#1235.

Did we ask for a bug report?

Then follow instructions in Article#1894.

Formatting tip!

Wrap blocks of code, error messages and BAM/VCF snippets--especially content with hashes (#)--with lines with three backticks ( ``` ) each to make a code block as demonstrated here.

Jump to another community
Download the latest Picard release at
GATK version 4.beta.3 (i.e. the third beta release) is out. See the GATK4 beta page for download and details.


Hi there,

I just walked a bit through GATK code and came across the class org.broadinstitute.sting.gatk.examples.GATKPaperGenotyper. The comments state that this genotyper is only intended to be used as example in the GATK paper and that it uses a much simpler model for calling than UnifiedGenotyper.

At first glance, this genotyper seems to apply the methods I thought GATK's UnifiedGenotyper would use in general (heterozygosity values for prior probability and using the base quality scores for genotype likelihood). So now I am interested in what way this simple genotyper differs from the strategies used in the actual tool - what other factors are considered in UnifiedGenotyper's statistical model? Up to now I could not figure out the actual differences to UnifiedGenotyper from just browsing through its code...

And what is more, how applicable is the simpler model for SNP calling in practice?

Best regards,


Best Answer


Sign In or Register to comment.