Notice:
If you happen to see a question you know the answer to, please do chime in and help your fellow community members. We encourage our fourm members to be more involved, jump in and help out your fellow researchers with their questions. GATK forum is a community forum and helping each other with using GATK tools and research is the cornerstone of our success as a genomics research community.We appreciate your help!

Test-drive the GATK tools and Best Practices pipelines on Terra


Check out this blog post to learn how you can get started with GATK and try out the pipelines in preconfigured workspaces (with a user-friendly interface!) without having to install anything.
Attention:
We will be out of the office on November 11th and 13th 2019, due to the U.S. holiday(Veteran's day) and due to a team event(Nov 13th). We will return to monitoring the GATK forum on November 12th and 14th respectively. Thank you for your patience.

what "mode" should I use for VariantRecalibrator?

rcholicrcholic DenverMember

For exome-sequencing, I was wondering how I should decide the "-mode" parameter? should I use "SNP" or "Indel" or both? I want to get both information in the final results, should I use "BOTH" -mode?

Answers

  • Geraldine_VdAuweraGeraldine_VdAuwera Cambridge, MAMember, Administrator, Broadie admin

    Use of the BOTH mode is no longer recommended, so please don't use that.

    You should recalibrate the two types of variants separately. The recommended workflow (described in the VQSR tutorial here) is to first recalibrate for one type of variant (eg the snps, using -mode SNP), then recalibrate the resulting VCF file for the other type (eg the indels, using -mode INDEL). When you recalibrate for one type, the variants of the other type are emitted to the output file without modification. This way you don't have to separate them into different files before recalibration.

  • rcholicrcholic DenverMember

    Thanks Geraldine. Can i use the vcf file from haplotypecaller to do snp and indel recalibration separately? Or you recommend recalibration in a sequential one-after-another order?

  • Geraldine_VdAuweraGeraldine_VdAuwera Cambridge, MAMember, Administrator, Broadie admin

    We recommend the sequential-order workflow because it is the most efficient, but you can modify the workflow to suit your needs, sure.

Sign In or Register to comment.