The current GATK version is 3.7-0
Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Get notifications!


You can opt in to receive email notifications, for example when your questions get answered or when there are new announcements, by following the instructions given here.

Got a problem?


1. Search using the upper-right search box, e.g. using the error message.
2. Try the latest version of tools.
3. Include tool and Java versions.
4. Tell us whether you are following GATK Best Practices.
5. Include relevant details, e.g. platform, DNA- or RNA-Seq, WES (+capture kit) or WGS (PCR-free or PCR+), paired- or single-end, read length, expected average coverage, somatic data, etc.
6. For tool errors, include the error stacktrace as well as the exact command.
7. For format issues, include the result of running ValidateSamFile for BAMs or ValidateVariants for VCFs.
8. For weird results, include an illustrative example, e.g. attach IGV screenshots according to Article#5484.
9. For a seeming variant that is uncalled, include results of following Article#1235.

Did we ask for a bug report?


Then follow instructions in Article#1894.

Formatting tip!


Wrap blocks of code, error messages and BAM/VCF snippets--especially content with hashes (#)--with lines with three backticks ( ``` ) each to make a code block as demonstrated here.

Jump to another community
Picard 2.10.2 is now available. As of 2.10.0, Picard supports NovaSeq CBCL data. Download and read release notes at https://github.com/broadinstitute/picard/releases.
**GATK4-BETA.2** is here. That's TWO, as in the second beta release. Be sure to read about the known issues before test driving. See Article#9881 to start and https://github.com/broadinstitute/gatk/blob/master/README.md for details.

wrong QD value in a vcf file

Hello,
Here is part of a vcf generated by GATK Unified Genotyper :

chr4 106196323 . TCAGA T 32729.73 LowQD AC=1;AF=0.500;AN=2;BaseQRankSum=21.836;DP=6712;FS=8.862;MLEAC=1;MLEAF=0.500;MQ=56.96;MQ0=0;MQRankSum=9.297;QD=1.22;RPA=2,1;RU=CAGA;ReadPosRankSum=7.319;STR GT:AD:DP:GQ:PL 0/1:4452,1723:6710:99:32767,0,32767

chr4 106196951 rs2454206 A G 5061.77 PASS ABHet=0.497;AC=1;AF=0.500;AN=2;BaseQRankSum=0.366;DB;DP=358;Dels=0.00;FS=7.738;HaplotypeScore=45.9328;MLEAC=1;MLEAF=0.500;MQ=57.45;MQ0=0;MQRankSum=0.483;QD=14.14;ReadPosRankSum=0.820 GT:AD:DP:GQ:PL 0/1:178,180:358:99:5090,0,5314

The first variant is filtred by the "LowQD filter" ( QD = 1.22 < 1.5) whereas it seems to be good.
Indeed : QD=QUAL/DP = 32729.73/6710 = 4.87.

When I calculate other QD for other variant in the same file, the result is good.

So, why GATK indicates a wrong QD value ?
(I did the Unified Genotyper twice, and the results are the same).

Thank you for your answer.
Cecile

Sign In or Register to comment.