The current GATK version is 3.8-0
Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Get notifications!

You can opt in to receive email notifications, for example when your questions get answered or when there are new announcements, by following the instructions given here.

Got a problem?

1. Search using the upper-right search box, e.g. using the error message.
2. Try the latest version of tools.
3. Include tool and Java versions.
4. Tell us whether you are following GATK Best Practices.
5. Include relevant details, e.g. platform, DNA- or RNA-Seq, WES (+capture kit) or WGS (PCR-free or PCR+), paired- or single-end, read length, expected average coverage, somatic data, etc.
6. For tool errors, include the error stacktrace as well as the exact command.
7. For format issues, include the result of running ValidateSamFile for BAMs or ValidateVariants for VCFs.
8. For weird results, include an illustrative example, e.g. attach IGV screenshots according to Article#5484.
9. For a seeming variant that is uncalled, include results of following Article#1235.

Did we ask for a bug report?

Then follow instructions in Article#1894.

Formatting tip!

Wrap blocks of code, error messages and BAM/VCF snippets--especially content with hashes (#)--with lines with three backticks ( ``` ) each to make a code block as demonstrated here.

Jump to another community
Download the latest Picard release at
GATK version 4.beta.3 (i.e. the third beta release) is out. See the GATK4 beta page for download and details.

Does MuTect work with reduced bam files produced by Reduce Reads?

Does MuTect work with reduced bam files produced by Reduce Reads?


  • kcibulkcibul Cambridge, MAMember, Broadie, Dev

    Currently MuTect does not perform well on Reduce Read bams. The problem is that in the act of reducing, a lot of sequencing noise is also reduced and thus our noise model is not well powered. Similarly in the normal, low allele fraction events are reduced right out of the BAMs.

    Conceptually, it's something that we would like to support but the trick will be to balance the compression against the loss of information. Right now, it will work if you set the reduction parameters very strictly... but at that point the BAMs is barely reduced thus defeating the purpose!

Sign In or Register to comment.