If you happen to see a question you know the answer to, please do chime in and help your fellow community members. We encourage our fourm members to be more involved, jump in and help out your fellow researchers with their questions. GATK forum is a community forum and helping each other with using GATK tools and research is the cornerstone of our success as a genomics research community.We appreciate your help!
Test-drive the GATK tools and Best Practices pipelines on Terra
Check out this blog post to learn how you can get started with GATK and try out the pipelines in preconfigured workspaces (with a user-friendly interface!) without having to install anything.
Do you recommend the use of the -newQual parameter
I have read here the following
The current model for calculating QUAL has some flaws that manifest, among other things, as a tendency to excessively penalize singletons and doubletons (variants observed only in one or two samples in a cohort), especially at large cohort sizes. It also uses different and needlessly complicated logic for dealing with haploid, diploid and polyploid cases, leading to "amusing" inconsistencies. No one likes that.
Assuming it continues to behave well in our hands and yours (those of you who switch it on), it will be the default model in GATK 4. And then it will get documented in loving detail too, of course.
So, I have a couple of questions.
Do you still recommend using this parameter? It has not replaced the default in gatk4, correct?
Does it only take affect when analysing the samples together with HaplotypeCaller in "-ERC GVCF" mode and then feeding the samples into GenotypeGVCFs?
Do I need to switch it on in both tools HaplotypeCaller and GenotypeGVCFs? If so, also in any others (e.g, filtration steps)?
How does it take affect for Mutect2? There is also a similar parameter one can switch on, correct?