Heads up:
We’re moving the GATK website, docs and forum to a new platform. Read the full story and breakdown of key changes on this blog.
If you happen to see a question you know the answer to, please do chime in and help your fellow community members. We encourage our fourm members to be more involved, jump in and help out your fellow researchers with their questions. GATK forum is a community forum and helping each other with using GATK tools and research is the cornerstone of our success as a genomics research community.We appreciate your help!

Test-drive the GATK tools and Best Practices pipelines on Terra

Check out this blog post to learn how you can get started with GATK and try out the pipelines in preconfigured workspaces (with a user-friendly interface!) without having to install anything.
We will be out of the office for a Broad Institute event from Dec 10th to Dec 11th 2019. We will be back to monitor the GATK forum on Dec 12th 2019. In the meantime we encourage you to help out other community members with their queries.
Thank you for your patience!

Low VAF somatic variants called across most samples by Mutect2

phoangphoang LondonMember

Dear GATK team,

I have been using MuTect2 to call somatic variants (100x WGS) and I am particularly interested in studying subclones (hence low VAF somatic mutations). After filtering, I realised that there are a significant number of mutations (up to 15-20% of total passed somatic mutations) ranging at low VAF (5-10%) across almost all samples. Could this perhaps be due to MuTect2 have higher sensitivty compared to other tools? I wonder if you have encountered this issue before and if you have any recommedations for (hard) filtering to increase confidence in the low VAF somatic variants called?

Thank you!


Sign In or Register to comment.