We’re moving the GATK website, docs and forum to a new platform. Read the full story and breakdown of key changes on this blog.
If you happen to see a question you know the answer to, please do chime in and help your fellow community members. We encourage our fourm members to be more involved, jump in and help out your fellow researchers with their questions. GATK forum is a community forum and helping each other with using GATK tools and research is the cornerstone of our success as a genomics research community.We appreciate your help!
Test-drive the GATK tools and Best Practices pipelines on Terra
Check out this blog post to learn how you can get started with GATK and try out the pipelines in preconfigured workspaces (with a user-friendly interface!) without having to install anything.
We will be out of the office for a Broad Institute event from Dec 10th to Dec 11th 2019. We will be back to monitor the GATK forum on Dec 12th 2019. In the meantime we encourage you to help out other community members with their queries.
Thank you for your patience!
Count of False Positives
After applying VariantRecalibrator, I am examining the SNP.tranches.pdf and SNP.tranches table output files. I am wondering, is it possible to get a count of the tranche-specific false-positives? This value isn't immediately obvious to me in the SNP.tranches table but is plotted in the graph in SNP.tranches.pdf and I would like to access those values.
My SNP.tranches table is shown here:
# Variant quality score tranches file # Version number 5 targetTruthSensitivity,numKnown,numNovel,knownTiTv,novelTiTv,minVQSLod,filterName,model,accessibleTruthSites,callsAtTruthSites,truthSensitivity 80.00,420195,76067,2.4862,2.0882,3.8931,VQSRTrancheSNP0.00to80.00,SNP,525369,420295,0.8000 90.00,472716,100489,2.4582,1.9875,2.2868,VQSRTrancheSNP80.00to90.00,SNP,525369,472832,0.9000 95.00,498977,113066,2.4434,1.9268,1.0517,VQSRTrancheSNP90.00to95.00,SNP,525369,499100,0.9500 99.00,519990,124866,2.4257,1.8821,-0.5150,VQSRTrancheSNP95.00to99.00,SNP,525369,520115,0.9900 99.90,524717,144668,2.4167,1.7196,-3.2399,VQSRTrancheSNP99.00to99.90,SNP,525369,524843,0.9990 100.00,525243,147612,2.4118,1.6796,-73.9905,VQSRTrancheSNP99.90to100.00,SNP,525369,525369,1.0000
Thanks so much. (And this is whole-exome data and I am following the Best Practices Guidelines - although we are using GATK version 3.5, this is a choice we made for the purpose of ensuring the highest possible consistency with older data called using version 3.5)