Heads up:
We’re moving the GATK website, docs and forum to a new platform. Read the full story and breakdown of key changes on this blog.
Notice:
If you happen to see a question you know the answer to, please do chime in and help your fellow community members. We encourage our fourm members to be more involved, jump in and help out your fellow researchers with their questions. GATK forum is a community forum and helping each other with using GATK tools and research is the cornerstone of our success as a genomics research community.We appreciate your help!

Test-drive the GATK tools and Best Practices pipelines on Terra


Check out this blog post to learn how you can get started with GATK and try out the pipelines in preconfigured workspaces (with a user-friendly interface!) without having to install anything.

Same pipeline for exome seq variant calling with different results

Hello Gatk team,

we have been running a pipeline using fastp, bwa-mem, and gatk with hard filtering to perform snp calling on exome seq data. Although the coverage statistics for fastq files is similar, we obtain a huge difference in the number of reads per snp. We wonder if it could be caused by hard filtering. Otherwise, could you suggest any idea of what can be going on?

Thanks in advanced.

Comments

  • bhanuGandhambhanuGandham Cambridge MAMember, Administrator, Broadie, Moderator admin

    Hi @paumarc

    I will need some more information to help you with this. Would you please post the exact commands you are using in your pipeline, the version of gatk you are using and the some records of the differences you see in the number of reads per snp.
    Thank you.

    Regards
    Bhanu

Sign In or Register to comment.