Heads up:
We’re moving the GATK website, docs and forum to a new platform. Read the full story and breakdown of key changes on this blog.
Notice:
If you happen to see a question you know the answer to, please do chime in and help your fellow community members. We encourage our fourm members to be more involved, jump in and help out your fellow researchers with their questions. GATK forum is a community forum and helping each other with using GATK tools and research is the cornerstone of our success as a genomics research community.We appreciate your help!

Test-drive the GATK tools and Best Practices pipelines on Terra


Check out this blog post to learn how you can get started with GATK and try out the pipelines in preconfigured workspaces (with a user-friendly interface!) without having to install anything.

The number of variants after hard-filter increased from the number of variants without hard-filter

How do I have more variants after hard-filtering than before hard-filtering?

Variant Call without hard-filtering:
~/gatk-4.0.8.1/gatk HaplotypeCaller -R Reference_genome.fasta -I KMM2_bwamem_alignment_samblaster_samtoolsview_samtoolssort_09292018.bam -O KMM2_raw_snps_indels_annotations_09302018.vcf -A BaseQualityRankSumTest -A FisherStrand -A MappingQu alityRankSumTest -A QualByDepth -A RMSMappingQuality -A ReadPosRankSumTest -A StrandOddsRatio -A InbreedingCoeff

(gatk) [[email protected] KMM2_analysis]$ grep -v '#' KMM2_raw_snps_indels_annotations_09302018.vcf | wc -l
701948

Variant Call with hard-filtering (snps):
~/gatk-4.0.8.1/gatk VariantFiltration -R Reference_genome.fasta -V KMM2_raw_snps_indels_annotations_09302018.vcf -filter "QD < 2.0 || MQ < 40.0 || FS > 60.0 || SOR > 3.0 || MQRankSum < -12.5 || ReadPosRankSum < -8.0" --filter-name "snpfilter1" -O KMM2_filtered_snps_snpfilter1_10012018.vcf

Variant Call with hard-filtering (indels):
~/gatk-4.0.8.1/gatk VariantFiltration -R Reference_genome.fasta -V KMM2_raw_snps_indels_annotations_09302018.vcf -filter "QD < 2.0 || MQ < 40.0 || FS > 60.0 || SOR > 3.0 || MQRankSum < -12.5 || ReadPosRankSum < -8.0" --filter-name "indfilter1" -O KMM2_filtered_indels_indfilter1_10012018.vcf

Merging hard-filtered snps and indels
picard MergeVcfs I=KMM2_filtered_snps_snpfilter1_10012018.vcf I=KMM2_filtered_indels_indfilter1_10012018.vcf O=KMM2_combined_filtered_variants_filter1_10012018.vcf

[[email protected] KMM2_analysis]$ grep 'PASS' KMM2_combined_filtered_variants_filter1_10012018.vcf | wc -l
1302970

Answers

  • shleeshlee CambridgeMember, Broadie ✭✭✭✭✭

    Hi again @kmmahan,

    I think this is a question you can answer with some probing, i.e. look into the VCF and see what is different. Given the difference between the two callsets is the merge of a SNPs-only callset with an INDEL-only callset, I suspect this may have to do with representing overlapping mixed variants in separate versus multiallelic variant records.

Sign In or Register to comment.