We’re moving the GATK website, docs and forum to a new platform. Read the full story and breakdown of key changes on this blog.
If you happen to see a question you know the answer to, please do chime in and help your fellow community members. We encourage our fourm members to be more involved, jump in and help out your fellow researchers with their questions. GATK forum is a community forum and helping each other with using GATK tools and research is the cornerstone of our success as a genomics research community.We appreciate your help!
Test-drive the GATK tools and Best Practices pipelines on Terra
Check out this blog post to learn how you can get started with GATK and try out the pipelines in preconfigured workspaces (with a user-friendly interface!) without having to install anything.
Order of reporting sites by GenotypeGVCFS
When I genotype a large and diverse cohort I often see an error about too many alleles at one position, which is fine. What puzzles me is why the sites in question are not reported in order, e.g. here position 102k is highlighted after 501k:
INFO 20:56:15,037 ProgressMeter - 0101:9012801 0.0 30.0 s 50.1 w 2.4% 21.2 m 20.7 m
WARN 20:56:26,448 GenotypingEngine - Attempting to genotype more than 50 alleles. Site will be skipped at location 0101:5019574
WARN 20:56:43,879 GenotypingEngine - Attempting to genotype more than 50 alleles. Site will be skipped at location 0101:1023160
As far as I can tell the sites are ordered in the gVCFs. Is this an unimportant idiosyncrasy of the Progress Meter output, or does it point to a problem with my input files?