The current GATK version is 3.7-0
Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Did you remember to?


1. Search using the upper-right search box, e.g. using the error message.
2. Try the latest version of tools.
3. Include tool and Java versions.
4. Tell us whether you are following GATK Best Practices.
5. Include relevant details, e.g. platform, DNA- or RNA-Seq, WES (+capture kit) or WGS (PCR-free or PCR+), paired- or single-end, read length, expected average coverage, somatic data, etc.
6. For tool errors, include the error stacktrace as well as the exact command.
7. For format issues, include the result of running ValidateSamFile for BAMs or ValidateVariants for VCFs.
8. For weird results, include an illustrative example, e.g. attach IGV screenshots according to Article#5484.
9. For a seeming variant that is uncalled, include results of following Article#1235.

Did we ask for a bug report?


Then follow instructions in Article#1894.

Formatting tip!


Surround blocks of code, error messages and BAM/VCF snippets--especially content with hashes (#)--with lines with three backticks ( ``` ) each to make a code block.
Powered by Vanilla. Made with Bootstrap.
Picard 2.9.0 is now available. Download and read release notes here.
GATK 3.7 is here! Be sure to read the Version Highlights and optionally the full Release Notes.

How does Picard's MarkDuplicates handle unique molecular barcodes and PCR error?

rbrnsrbrns DFCIMember Posts: 2
edited September 2016 in Ask the GATK team

Hello,

I'm interested in using unique molecular barcodes to help distinguish what is PCR error in my samples. My current understanding of how MarkDuplicates chooses a "best-pair" is that it chooses this best pair based on a high sum of base quality scores. Sequences containing PCR errors can also have great base qualities. Has any additional logic been implemented to help distinguish reads containing PCR errors from the original template sequence when using unique molecular barcodes?

Thank you!

Issue · Github
by Sheila

Issue Number
1321
State
closed
Last Updated
Assignee
Array
Milestone
Array
Closed By
chandrans

Answers

  • SheilaSheila Broad InstituteMember, Broadie, Moderator, Dev Posts: 4,456 admin

    @rbrns
    Hi,

    Sorry for the late response. It is true the tool currently uses the start position of the reads and chooses the"best read" that has the highest base and mapping qualities.

    However, there is a tool in Picard that is in active development.
    Right now it is an alpha tool, but it can deduplicate reads based on UMI.

    -Sheila

  • rbrnsrbrns DFCIMember Posts: 2

    Thank you for getting back to me!

    Can you clarify your first statement:

    "It is true the tool currently uses the start position of the reads and chooses the"best read" that has the highest base and mapping qualities."

    Does this mean that within a set of reads with one UMI that the program still chooses the 'best read' based on base and mapping quality for this one UMI? Or does markduplicates completely disregard the UMI at this point?

    Thank you again!

    Issue · Github
    by Sheila

    Issue Number
    1360
    State
    open
    Last Updated
    Assignee
    Array
    Milestone
    Array
  • SheilaSheila Broad InstituteMember, Broadie, Moderator, Dev Posts: 4,456 admin

    @rbrns
    Hi,

    The current MarkDuplicates does not use UMIs at all. The UMI work is in progress.

    -Sheila

Sign In or Register to comment.