It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
This document describes the tools and concepts involved in performing sequence coverage analysis, where the purpose is to answer the common question: "(Where) Do I have enough sequence data to be empowered to discover variants with reasonable confidence?".
The tools involved are the following:
DepthOfCoverage: for QC'ing coverage in whole-genome data (WGS)
DiagnoseTargets: for QC'ing coverage in exome data (WEx)
For an overview of the major annotations that are used by variant callers to express read depth at a variant site, and guidelines for using those metrics to evaluate variants, please see this document.
Coverage analysis generally aims to answer the common question: "(Where) Do I have enough sequence data to be empowered to discover variants with reasonable confidence?".
This section is incomplete.
DepthOfCoverage is a coverage profiler for a (possibly multi-sample) bam file. It uses a granular histogram that can be user-specified to present useful aggregate coverage data. It reports the following metrics over the entire .bam file:
That last matrix is key to answering the question posed above, so we recommend running this tool on all samples together.
Note that DepthOfCoverage can be configured to output these statistics aggregated over genes by providing it with a RefSeq gene list.
DepthOfCoverage also outputs, by default, the total coverage at every locus, and the coverage per sample and/or read group. This behavior can optionally be turned off, or switched to base count mode, where base counts will be output at each locus, rather than total depth.
To get a summary of coverage by each gene, you may supply a refseq (or alternative) gene list via the argument
The provided gene list must be of the following format:
585 NM_001005484 chr1 + 58953 59871 58953 59871 1 58953, 59871, 0 OR4F5 cmpl cmpl 0, 587 NM_001005224 chr1 + 357521 358460 357521 358460 1 357521, 358460, 0 OR4F3 cmpl cmpl 0, 587 NM_001005277 chr1 + 357521 358460 357521 358460 1 357521, 358460, 0 OR4F16 cmpl cmpl 0, 587 NM_001005221 chr1 + 357521 358460 357521 358460 1 357521, 358460, 0 OR4F29 cmpl cmpl 0, 589 NM_001005224 chr1 - 610958 611897 610958 611897 1 610958, 611897, 0 OR4F3 cmpl cmpl 0, 589 NM_001005277 chr1 - 610958 611897 610958 611897 1 610958, 611897, 0 OR4F16 cmpl cmpl 0, 589 NM_001005221 chr1 - 610958 611897 610958 611897 1 610958, 611897, 0 OR4F29 cmpl cmpl 0,
For users who have access to internal Broad resources, the properly-formatted file containing refseq genes and transcripts is located at
If you do not have access (if you don't know, you probably don't have it), you can generate your own as described here.
If you supply the
-geneList argument, DepthOfCoverage will output an additional summary file that looks as follows:
Gene_Name Total_Cvg Avg_Cvg Sample_1_Total_Cvg Sample_1_Avg_Cvg Sample_1_Cvg_Q3 Sample_1_Cvg_Median Sample_1_Cvg_Q1 SORT1 594710 238.27 594710 238.27 165 245 330 NOTCH2 3011542 357.84 3011542 357.84 222 399 >500 LMNA 563183 186.73 563183 186.73 116 187 262 NOS1AP 513031 203.50 513031 203.50 91 191 290
Note that the gene coverage will be aggregated only over samples (not read groups, libraries, or other types). The
-geneList argument also requires specific intervals within genes to be given (say, the particular exons you are interested in, or the entire gene), and it functions by aggregating coverage from the interval level to the gene level, by referencing each interval to the gene in which it falls. Because by-gene aggregation looks for intervals that overlap genes,
-geneList is ignored if
-omitIntervals is thrown.
DiagnoseTargets produces a pseudo-VCF file that provides a "CallableStatus" judgment for each position or range of positions in the input bam file. The possible judgments are as follows:
PASS : The base satisfied the min. depth for calling but had less than maxDepth to avoid having EXCESSIVE_COVERAGE.
COVERAGE_GAPS : Absolutely no coverage was observed at a locus, regardless of the filtering parameters.
LOW_COVERAGE : There were less than min. depth bases at the locus, after applying filters.
EXCESSIVE_COVERAGE: More than
-maxDepth read at the locus, indicating some sort of mapping problem.
POOR_QUALITY : More than
--maxFractionOfReadsWithLowMAPQ at the locus, indicating a poor mapping quality of the reads.
BAD_MATE : The reads are not properly mated, suggesting mapping errors.
NO_READS : There are no reads contained in the interval.