The current GATK version is 3.7-0
Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Powered by Vanilla. Made with Bootstrap.
GATK 3.7 is here! Be sure to read the Version Highlights and optionally the full Release Notes.
Register now for the upcoming GATK Best Practices workshop, Feb 20-22 in Leuven, Belgium. Open to all comers! More info and signup at

What determines an active region? Different HaplotypeCaller results for small vs. large cohorts

mlindermmlinderm Member Posts: 29

We observed a de-novo mutation identified by HC in a single trio that was not called when the same trio is included in a larger 95-sample cohort. The immediate cause seems to be that in the larger cohort the region surrounding this variant is no longer considered active. I also observe that whether the region is "active" depends on how large of an interval I supply. A 100bp interval centered on the site has active regions, a 300bp interval does not. When I "forceActive" the variant is called as expected in all intervals.

I can't find much information about how active regions are determined. At first, I hypothesized that the activity profile scores were smaller in the larger cohort (and thus no longer crossing the fixed threshold in, but the scores as dumped by --activityProfileOut look to have similar magnitude. What other information does active region determination take into account? How can I interpret the --activeRegionOut output? For the 300bp interval where the variant (@ chr3:51992816) is not called I get

#track graphType=line
Chromosome  Start   End Feature ActiveRegions
chr3    51992665    51992666    end-marker  0.00000
chr3    51992665    51992778    size=113    -1.00000
chr3    51992778    51992779    end-marker  0.00000
chr3    51992778    51992948    size=170    1.00000
chr3    51992948    51992949    end-marker  0.00000
chr3    51992948    51992966    size=18 -1.00000

When I use a smaller 100bp interval, I get the following active regions output:

#track graphType=line
Chromosome  Start   End Feature ActiveRegions
chr3    51992765    51992766    end-marker  0.00000
chr3    51992765    51992778    size=13 -1.00000
chr3    51992778    51992779    end-marker  0.00000
chr3    51992778    51992853    size=75 1.00000
chr3    51992853    51992854    end-marker  0.00000
chr3    51992853    51992866    size=13 -1.00000

The one noticeable difference between the two is the length of the potential active regions (75 vs 170), does that impact anything? Why despite the above output suggesting that there is indeed an active region does local assembly not get performed? Of note, in the larger cohort there is another singleton variant 82bp downstream in another sample (i.e. not in the original trio). I presume it is that variant that is leading to the longer active region.





  • byb121byb121 UKMember Posts: 24


    I want to ask the same question. Is it possible that someone can shed light on how exactly active regions are determined when using HaplotypeCaller?


  • Geraldine_VdAuweraGeraldine_VdAuwera Administrator, Dev Posts: 10,979 admin

    Whoops, looks like we forgot to answer this question way back when -- sorry @mlinderm!

    @byb121‌ We have a new doc that is almost ready that explains this in some detail -- it will be posted by Friday at the latest.

    Geraldine Van der Auwera, PhD

  • severinecseverinec Member Posts: 57

    Hi Geraldine
    Sorry this may have been asked before, but can you please point to links of existing docs that described the Gatk-HC various steps: determination of active regions and candidate haplotypes, calculation of likelihoods. been searching for presentations/documents but haven't found much so far. Many thanks!

  • Geraldine_VdAuweraGeraldine_VdAuwera Administrator, Dev Posts: 10,979 admin

    @severinec‌ Working on the new doc right now, preliminary version will be up tomorrow.

    Geraldine Van der Auwera, PhD

Sign In or Register to comment.