The current GATK version is 3.7-0
Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Did you remember to?


1. Search using the upper-right search box, e.g. using the error message.
2. Try the latest version of tools.
3. Include tool and Java versions.
4. Tell us whether you are following GATK Best Practices.
5. Include relevant details, e.g. platform, DNA- or RNA-Seq, WES (+capture kit) or WGS (PCR-free or PCR+), paired- or single-end, read length, expected average coverage, somatic data, etc.
6. For tool errors, include the error stacktrace as well as the exact command.
7. For format issues, include the result of running ValidateSamFile for BAMs or ValidateVariants for VCFs.
8. For weird results, include an illustrative example, e.g. attach IGV screenshots according to Article#5484.
9. For a seeming variant that is uncalled, include results of following Article#1235.

Did we ask for a bug report?


Then follow instructions in Article#1894.

Formatting tip!


Surround blocks of code, error messages and BAM/VCF snippets--especially content with hashes (#)--with lines with three backticks ( ``` ) each to make a code block.
Powered by Vanilla. Made with Bootstrap.
Picard 2.9.0 is now available. Download and read release notes here.
GATK 3.7 is here! Be sure to read the Version Highlights and optionally the full Release Notes.

Is the parallelism documentation for DepthOfCoverage correct?

LeeTL1220LeeTL1220 Arlington, MAMember, Broadie, Dev Posts: 86 ✭✭

http://www.broadinstitute.org/gatk/gatkdocs/org_broadinstitute_sting_gatk_walkers_coverage_DepthOfCoverage.html
states (bold is my emphasis):

Parallelism options

This tool can be run in multi-threaded mode using this option.

TreeReducible (-nt)

Yet when I run the GATK with -nt, I get an error that -nt is not supported (truncated to save space):

ERROR A USER ERROR has occurred (version 2.8-1-g932cd3a):
ERROR MESSAGE: Invalid command line: Argument nt has a bad value: The analysis DepthOfCoverage aggregates results by interval. Due to a current limitation of the GATK, analyses of this type do not currently support parallel execution. Please run your analysis without the -nt option.

Answers

  • LeeTL1220LeeTL1220 Arlington, MAMember, Broadie, Dev Posts: 86 ✭✭

    Apologies for the poor markdown

  • Geraldine_VdAuweraGeraldine_VdAuwera Cambridge, MAMember, Administrator, Broadie Posts: 11,421 admin

    No worries. We'll improve the error message on this for the next version; the issue is that by default, the tool produces a summary of data aggregated over intervals, which is not compatible with multithreading. However, if you disable the per-interval reporting (see -omitIntervalStatistics ifI remember correctly), you will be able to use the multithreading.

    Geraldine Van der Auwera, PhD

  • LeeTL1220LeeTL1220 Arlington, MAMember, Broadie, Dev Posts: 86 ✭✭

    --omitIntervalStatistics got rid of the error. Thanks!

  • Shrey_SShrey_S Member Posts: 25
    edited January 2014

    So, what is the max memory that could be allocated to depthOfCoverage
    I use -Xmx2G.....I use the older GATK version GenomeAnalysisTK-1.6-13, hence cannot use multithreading option, i,.e -nt
    But if I go more that 2G on the -Xmx value then I think it wont make any difference..correct?

  • Geraldine_VdAuweraGeraldine_VdAuwera Cambridge, MAMember, Administrator, Broadie Posts: 11,421 admin

    Hi @Shrey_S,

    I would say that's correct, yes -- I wouldn't expect memory to be the limiting factor for DepthOfCoverage, so increasing the allocation won't make it go faster, unfortunately.

    Geraldine Van der Auwera, PhD

  • Shrey_SShrey_S Member Posts: 25

    So that means if I use -Xmx6G it would still use 2G which is the max it could use...
    Is 2G the standard max memory for all the GATK tools (i.e. if we run them without multithreading)?

  • Geraldine_VdAuweraGeraldine_VdAuwera Cambridge, MAMember, Administrator, Broadie Posts: 11,421 admin

    No, I mean you can allocate more, and if it needs to it could potentially use the extra memory (there is no hard limit set internally for any tool), but it is unlikely that the tool would need that much memory.

    Geraldine Van der Auwera, PhD

  • Shrey_SShrey_S Member Posts: 25
    edited January 2014

    Alright Geraldine..Thanks for the reply....:)

Sign In or Register to comment.