The current GATK version is 3.7-0
Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Did you remember to?


1. Search using the upper-right search box, e.g. using the error message.
2. Try the latest version of tools.
3. Include tool and Java versions.
4. Tell us whether you are following GATK Best Practices.
5. Include relevant details, e.g. platform, DNA- or RNA-Seq, WES (+capture kit) or WGS (PCR-free or PCR+), paired- or single-end, read length, expected average coverage, somatic data, etc.
6. For tool errors, include the error stacktrace as well as the exact command.
7. For format issues, include the result of running ValidateSamFile for BAMs or ValidateVariants for VCFs.
8. For weird results, include an illustrative example, e.g. attach IGV screenshots according to Article#5484.
9. For a seeming variant that is uncalled, include results of following Article#1235.

Did we ask for a bug report?


Then follow instructions in Article#1894.

Formatting tip!


Surround blocks of code, error messages and BAM/VCF snippets--especially content with hashes (#)--with lines with three backticks ( ``` ) each to make a code block.
Powered by Vanilla. Made with Bootstrap.
Picard 2.9.0 is now available. Download and read release notes here.
GATK 3.7 is here! Be sure to read the Version Highlights and optionally the full Release Notes.

HaplotypeCaller on 2000 samples, feasible?

tommycarstensentommycarstensen United KingdomMember Posts: 404 ✭✭✭

I have previously tested HaplotypeCaller (GATK 2.7) on 100 samples. It takes a long time to run compared to UnifiedGenotyper. Is it feasible to use HaplotypeCaller on 2000 samples? Can I make it run faster other than by using multi-threading? Would it be an advantage for me to run ReduceReads prior to variant calling? I know the details are sparse, but I currently do not have any additional information. Thank you.

Tagged:

Best Answers

Answers

  • tommycarstensentommycarstensen United KingdomMember Posts: 404 ✭✭✭

    Geraldine, thank you for your answer. I have heard from multiple sources, that HC was one of the tools used for calling SNPs for phase III of the 1000G project; i.e. 2500 samples. Would you happen to know, what procedure was used to scale to this number of samples?

    It's almost like growing up hearing about the awesome dance moves of the phantom dancer "BreakArray", but nobody has ever witnessed him in action. It would be great, if you or someone else can enlighten me. Thank you.

  • tommycarstensentommycarstensen United KingdomMember Posts: 404 ✭✭✭

    Geraldine, is your new approach for single sample variant discovery with per-site-across-samples-likelihood analysis ready? I would like to test it, if a beta is available in a developer branch.

  • Geraldine_VdAuweraGeraldine_VdAuwera Cambridge, MAMember, Administrator, Broadie Posts: 11,388 admin

    Hi Tommy,

    We've got it working internally and are now finalizing the last details, tweaks etc. before we release it. I'll check if it's beta-testable in the public nightlies but I think there are still a few pieces that aren't accessible. FYI we plan to release 3.0 in the next couple of weeks.

    Geraldine Van der Auwera, PhD

Sign In or Register to comment.