The current GATK version is 3.7-0
Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04

#### Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

You can opt in to receive email notifications, for example when your questions get answered or when there are new announcements, by following the instructions given here.

#### ☞ Did you remember to?

1. Search using the upper-right search box, e.g. using the error message.
3. Include tool and Java versions.
4. Tell us whether you are following GATK Best Practices.
5. Include relevant details, e.g. platform, DNA- or RNA-Seq, WES (+capture kit) or WGS (PCR-free or PCR+), paired- or single-end, read length, expected average coverage, somatic data, etc.
6. For tool errors, include the error stacktrace as well as the exact command.
7. For format issues, include the result of running ValidateSamFile for BAMs or ValidateVariants for VCFs.
8. For weird results, include an illustrative example, e.g. attach IGV screenshots according to Article#5484.
9. For a seeming variant that is uncalled, include results of following Article#1235.

#### ☞ Formatting tip!

Wrap blocks of code, error messages and BAM/VCF snippets--especially content with hashes (#)--with lines with three backticks ( ` ) each to make a code block as demonstrated here.

GATK 3.7 is here! Be sure to read the Version Highlights and optionally the full Release Notes.

# CatVariants or CombineVariants

Hong KongPosts: 14

If I want to merge different VCF files, which I used -L argument for calling variants against to different chromosomes individually with the same list of samples by HaplotypeCaller. I mean the sample are the same, I just used -L to call variants chromosome by chromosome separately. I suppose whether catVariants or CombineVariant will give me the same results, right ?

Tagged:

Yes, they will give you the same results; only the headers will be slightly different because CatVariant will just use the header of the first VCF file, while CombineVariants will generate a new header. CatVariants is faster.

Geraldine Van der Auwera, PhD

• Hong KongPosts: 14

Thanks for quick reply. Here is the original command I tried

${java7} -Xmx2g -jar$GATK/GenomeAnalysisTK.jar \
-R $reference_genome \ -T CombineVariants \ --variant$inputdir/chr01.vcf \
--variant $inputdir/chr02.vcf \ --variant$inputdir/chr03.vcf \
--variant $inputdir/chr04.vcf \ -o$vcf_output \
-nt 8 \
-genotypeMergeOptions UNIQUIFY

Will that be different than this ?

${java7} -cp$GATK/GenomeAnalysisTK.jar org.broadinstitute.sting.tools.CatVariants \
-R $reference_genome \ -V$inputdir/chr01.vcf \
-V $inputdir/chr02.vcf \ -V$inputdir/chr03.vcf \
-V $inputdir/chr04.vcf \ -out$vcf_output \
-assumeSorted

As you mentioned it, the CombineVariants will generate another header and the size is larger than CatVariants very much, but the content is the same. Could you please explain more ?

The results, in terms of how variant records are combined, should be essentially the same if the files you are merging involve all the same samples, just different chromosomes. What differences are you observing exactly? Can you maybe post the headers?

Geraldine Van der Auwera, PhD

• USAPosts: 95

I am usig GATK 3.5

I am doing per chromosome HaplotypeCaller (in GVCF mode) calls with -L argument, which is similar to what @jacobhsu is doing.

I know that CatVariants can be used to concatenate .vcf files for a given sample.

I would like to confirm that CatVariants can also be used to concatenate .g.vcf files ?

I am asking this question because in the CatVariants documentation here, there is no mention of .g.vcf files

Thanks,
mglcliinical