The current GATK version is 3.7-0
Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Get notifications!


You can opt in to receive email notifications, for example when your questions get answered or when there are new announcements, by following the instructions given here.

Did you remember to?


1. Search using the upper-right search box, e.g. using the error message.
2. Try the latest version of tools.
3. Include tool and Java versions.
4. Tell us whether you are following GATK Best Practices.
5. Include relevant details, e.g. platform, DNA- or RNA-Seq, WES (+capture kit) or WGS (PCR-free or PCR+), paired- or single-end, read length, expected average coverage, somatic data, etc.
6. For tool errors, include the error stacktrace as well as the exact command.
7. For format issues, include the result of running ValidateSamFile for BAMs or ValidateVariants for VCFs.
8. For weird results, include an illustrative example, e.g. attach IGV screenshots according to Article#5484.
9. For a seeming variant that is uncalled, include results of following Article#1235.

Did we ask for a bug report?


Then follow instructions in Article#1894.

Formatting tip!


Wrap blocks of code, error messages and BAM/VCF snippets--especially content with hashes (#)--with lines with three backticks ( ``` ) each to make a code block as demonstrated here.

Jump to another community
Picard 2.9.4 is now available. Download and read release notes here.
GATK 3.7 is here! Be sure to read the Version Highlights and optionally the full Release Notes.

-BQSR param in UnifiedGenotyper

Hello,

I have a question regarding the BQSR param when running the UnifiedGenotyper. If I leave away that param, will there be a "default" confusion matrix applied for (single-sample) SNP calling?

Best, Cindy

Best Answer

Answers

  • Geraldine_VdAuweraGeraldine_VdAuwera Cambridge, MAMember, Administrator, Broadie

    Hi Cindy,

    I think you're confused about the usage of the BQSR parameter. It is meant to be used for recalibration of base qualities, and has no direct effect on variant calling calculations. Although it can be applied at the UG step as a matter of convenience, our recommendation is to apply it in a preliminary step with PrintReads, in order to generate an appropriately recalibrated file for archival purposes.

    Either way, our best practice recommendation is to apply base recalibration at some point before calling variants in order to ensure the most accurate results possible. If you skip this step, you may be allowing systematic errors to affect your data.

  • Hi Geraldine,

    ok, so then I misunderstood it. I thought this would be used for the confusion matrix. If not, so what does the confusion matrix mentioned in http://gatkforums.broadinstitute.org/discussion/1237 look like? Is it hard coded somewhere (I unfortunately could not figure it out in the code) and taken from the supplementary material of the GATK paper (), is it derived from the actual data?

  • Geraldine_VdAuweraGeraldine_VdAuwera Cambridge, MAMember, Administrator, Broadie

    Oh, I see now. You were actually essentially correct in your interpretation, I misunderstood what you were asking because I'm used to considering BQSR and calling entirely separately. But yes, that part of the model uses the recalibrated base quality scores from BQSR, which is where the confusion matrix comes in.

  • Ok, and what is the default value then when the confusion matrix is not specified by the user? will there be no confusion matrix used at all?

Sign In or Register to comment.