The current GATK version is 3.7-0
Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04

#### Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

#### ☞ Did you remember to?

1. Search using the upper-right search box, e.g. using the error message.
3. Include tool and Java versions.
4. Tell us whether you are following GATK Best Practices.
5. Include relevant details, e.g. platform, DNA- or RNA-Seq, WES (+capture kit) or WGS (PCR-free or PCR+), paired- or single-end, read length, expected average coverage, somatic data, etc.
6. For tool errors, include the error stacktrace as well as the exact command.
7. For format issues, include the result of running ValidateSamFile for BAMs or ValidateVariants for VCFs.
8. For weird results, include an illustrative example, e.g. attach IGV screenshots according to Article#5484.
9. For a seeming variant that is uncalled, include results of following Article#1235.

#### ☞ Formatting tip!

Surround blocks of code, error messages and BAM/VCF snippets--especially content with hashes (#)--with lines with three backticks ( ` ) each to make a code block.
GATK 3.7 is here! Be sure to read the Version Highlights and optionally the full Release Notes.

# How well does BWA/GATK work with sequences that are >20% divergent?

Baltimore, MDMember Posts: 4
edited July 2013

I have the genomes of several isolates of a parasite, and I would like to investigate synonymous/non-synonymous substitution for identifying potential antigens, as well as SNPs genome-wide and I am wondering how well BWA/GATK are suited for this purpose. I've been told that BWA is only very good with sequences <2% divergent, and some of the antigens in this specie are known to be >20% divergent. However, I also know that GATK does local realignments of indels. So I would specifically like to know - is BWA/GATK good for looking at substitutions/SNPs in highly variable genes, and if not which other alignment tools are compatible and appropriate for this purpose?

Tagged: