The current GATK version is 3.7-0
Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Powered by Vanilla. Made with Bootstrap.
GATK 3.7 is here! Be sure to read the Version Highlights and optionally the full Release Notes.
Register now for the upcoming GATK Best Practices workshop, Feb 20-22 in Leuven, Belgium. Open to all comers! More info and signup at

Different variant calls using the intervals options

laportelaporte MontrealMember Posts: 7


Using the UnifiedGenotyper, I am having different results when using the --intervals option. Particularly at the edge of a region (at 20bps), some samples that had borderline calls change their genotype when filtering by the interval. I can see that the read counts in the AD Format field stays the same but the PL changes, resulting in a change of genotype call. I was wondering if the intervals options removes reads that spans the region ? what can result in having differnt PL values ?

Without intervals option
miSeq003.merge.sort.UnifiedGenotyper.vcf:DNAJC13.1K_flanks.60npl 43638 . A G 7028.01 . AC=45;AF=0.079;AN=572;BaseQRankSum=-257.764;DP=295778;Dels=0.00;FS=3200.000;HaplotypeScore=278.6356;InbreedingCoeff=-0.0850;MLEAC=43;MLEAF=0.075;MQ=58.16;MQ0=0;MQRankSum=-274.890;QD=0.17;ReadPosRankSum=-276.375 GT:AD:ADS:DP:GQ:PL 0/1:679,92:340,339,91,1:734:17:17,0,14068 ......

With intervals
miSeq003.merge.sort.UnifiedGenotyper.intervals.vcf:DNAJC13.1K_flanks.60npl 43638 . A G 6459.50 . AC=40;AF=0.070;AN=572;BaseQRankSum=-257.671;DP=295778;Dels=0.00;FS=3200.000;HaplotypeScore=278.6356;InbreedingCoeff=-0.0754;MLEAC=39;MLEAF=0.068;MQ=58.16;MQ0=0;MQRankSum=-274.744;QD=0.18;ReadPosRankSum=-276.325 GT:AD:ADS:DP:GQ:PL 0/0:679,92:340,339,91,1:734:2:0,2,14073 ......

Best Answers


  • laportelaporte MontrealMember Posts: 7

    Thanks Geraldine. Here is my command line:

    java -Xmx24g -jar /RQexec/dionnela/soft/packages/GATK/dist/GenomeAnalysisTK.jar -T UnifiedGenotyper --input_file ${PROJECT}.merge.sort.bam -R ../DNAJC13.1K_flanks.60npl.fasta -nt 12 -o $VCF --metrics_file ${PROJECT}.merge.sort.UnifiedGenotyper.metrics --genotype_likelihoods_model BOTH --downsample_to_coverage 10000

    As you can see, I use --downsample_to_coverage 10000 and coverage for the loci is below that threshold. Is there another parameter/variable that can generate downsampling effect ?

  • laportelaporte MontrealMember Posts: 7

    Okay, got it. Thanks for the help

Sign In or Register to comment.