The current GATK version is 3.6-0
Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Powered by Vanilla. Made with Bootstrap.
Register now for the upcoming GATK Best Practices workshop, Nov 7-8 at the Broad in Cambridge, MA. Open to all comers! More info and signup at

wrong QD value in a vcf file

fourragefourrage Posts: 1Member

Here is part of a vcf generated by GATK Unified Genotyper :

chr4 106196323 . TCAGA T 32729.73 LowQD AC=1;AF=0.500;AN=2;BaseQRankSum=21.836;DP=6712;FS=8.862;MLEAC=1;MLEAF=0.500;MQ=56.96;MQ0=0;MQRankSum=9.297;QD=1.22;RPA=2,1;RU=CAGA;ReadPosRankSum=7.319;STR GT:AD:DP:GQ:PL 0/1:4452,1723:6710:99:32767,0,32767

chr4 106196951 rs2454206 A G 5061.77 PASS ABHet=0.497;AC=1;AF=0.500;AN=2;BaseQRankSum=0.366;DB;DP=358;Dels=0.00;FS=7.738;HaplotypeScore=45.9328;MLEAC=1;MLEAF=0.500;MQ=57.45;MQ0=0;MQRankSum=0.483;QD=14.14;ReadPosRankSum=0.820 GT:AD:DP:GQ:PL 0/1:178,180:358:99:5090,0,5314

The first variant is filtred by the "LowQD filter" ( QD = 1.22 < 1.5) whereas it seems to be good.
Indeed : QD=QUAL/DP = 32729.73/6710 = 4.87.

When I calculate other QD for other variant in the same file, the result is good.

So, why GATK indicates a wrong QD value ?
(I did the Unified Genotyper twice, and the results are the same).

Thank you for your answer.

Sign In or Register to comment.