The current GATK version is 3.7-0
Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

You can opt in to receive email notifications, for example when your questions get answered or when there are new announcements, by following the instructions given here.

☞ Did you remember to?

1. Search using the upper-right search box, e.g. using the error message.
3. Include tool and Java versions.
4. Tell us whether you are following GATK Best Practices.
5. Include relevant details, e.g. platform, DNA- or RNA-Seq, WES (+capture kit) or WGS (PCR-free or PCR+), paired- or single-end, read length, expected average coverage, somatic data, etc.
6. For tool errors, include the error stacktrace as well as the exact command.
7. For format issues, include the result of running ValidateSamFile for BAMs or ValidateVariants for VCFs.
8. For weird results, include an illustrative example, e.g. attach IGV screenshots according to Article#5484.
9. For a seeming variant that is uncalled, include results of following Article#1235.

☞ Formatting tip!

Wrap blocks of code, error messages and BAM/VCF snippets--especially content with hashes (#)--with lines with three backticks (  ) each to make a code block as demonstrated here.

GATK 3.7 is here! Be sure to read the Version Highlights and optionally the full Release Notes.

how to increase our call confidence

Member

Our call variants analysis, has more far more variants than we expect, including some low-call-confidences and non-coding variants on whole exome. Is there any suggestion on how to increase our call confidence and decrease the total number of variants. Specifically, I had question about the out_mode option.

below is a sample code of our UnifiedGenotyper,

java -Xmx8g -Djava.io.tmpdir=/tmp/evm-gatk/ \
-jar /medpop/mpg-psrl/Parabase/Tools/GenomeAnalysisTK-2.3-9-ge5ebf34/GenomeAnalysisTK.jar \
-T UnifiedGenotyper \
-R /medpop/mpg-psrl/Parabase/hg19/ucsc.hg19.fasta \
-I /medpop/mpg-psrl/Parabase/Projects/final/final.list \
-o /medpop/mpg-psrl/Parabase/Projects/final/S284.snp.small.vcf \
-stand_call_conf 50.0 \
-stand_emit_conf 10.0 \
-out_mode EMIT_VARIANTS_ONLY \
--dbsnp /medpop/mpg-psrl/Parabase/hg19/dbsnp_137.hg19.vcf \
-l INFO \
-A DepthOfCoverage \
-A HaplotypeScore \
-A InbreedingCoeff \
-A LowMQ \
-glm SNP \
-dcov 200 \
-nt 4 \
-nct 3 \

Thanks
`
Tagged:

• Charlestown, MAMember

are they passing filters? your emit_conf is pretty low, so you'll probably see a lot of variants between 10-50 that will be emitted but not pass your Q50 threshold.

• Member

Thanks; I will try a higher value for emit_conf,

Regarding -out_mode, I expect to see less variants by setting it to EMIT_ALL_CONFIDENT_SITES, than EMIT_VARIANTS_ONLY, but I got more ! can you explain a little bit the differences ?!

Thank you

• Charlestown, MAMember

emit all confident sites will emit all sites including reference that pass your Q10 confidence threshold for emitting.