The current GATK version is 3.7-0
Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Get notifications!


You can opt in to receive email notifications, for example when your questions get answered or when there are new announcements, by following the instructions given here.

Did you remember to?


1. Search using the upper-right search box, e.g. using the error message.
2. Try the latest version of tools.
3. Include tool and Java versions.
4. Tell us whether you are following GATK Best Practices.
5. Include relevant details, e.g. platform, DNA- or RNA-Seq, WES (+capture kit) or WGS (PCR-free or PCR+), paired- or single-end, read length, expected average coverage, somatic data, etc.
6. For tool errors, include the error stacktrace as well as the exact command.
7. For format issues, include the result of running ValidateSamFile for BAMs or ValidateVariants for VCFs.
8. For weird results, include an illustrative example, e.g. attach IGV screenshots according to Article#5484.
9. For a seeming variant that is uncalled, include results of following Article#1235.

Did we ask for a bug report?


Then follow instructions in Article#1894.

Formatting tip!


Wrap blocks of code, error messages and BAM/VCF snippets--especially content with hashes (#)--with lines with three backticks ( ``` ) each to make a code block as demonstrated here.

Jump to another community
Picard 2.9.0 is now available. Download and read release notes here.
GATK 3.7 is here! Be sure to read the Version Highlights and optionally the full Release Notes.

SNP calling filtering

HomaHoma Posts: 25

Hi,

I am using RNA-seq data for SNP calling. I have used the Unified genotyper tool from GATK with this command:

java -Xmx22g -jar /bubo/sw/apps/bioinfo/GATK/2.3.6/GenomeAnalysisTK.jar -T UnifiedGenotyper -R path/to/myreference.fa -I path/to/mybamfile.bam -stand_call_conf 30 -stand_emit_conf 30 -o snps.raw.vcf

I have obtained SNPs mostly with very high phred scale but the filter field is "." for all my SNPs, there is no PASS or LowQual in the field.
I read in the GATK forum that:
" If the FILTER field is a ".", then no filtering has been applied to the records, meaning that all of the records will be used for analysis but without explicitly saying that any PASS. You should avoid such a situation by always filtering raw variant calls before analysis. "

I was wondering about the filtering process, is it a parameter that I should add to my command or I must do it in another way?

Thanks a lot for your help.

Best Answer

Answers

Sign In or Register to comment.