The current GATK version is 3.7-0
Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04

#### Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

You can opt in to receive email notifications, for example when your questions get answered or when there are new announcements, by following the instructions given here.

#### ☞ Did you remember to?

1. Search using the upper-right search box, e.g. using the error message.
3. Include tool and Java versions.
4. Tell us whether you are following GATK Best Practices.
5. Include relevant details, e.g. platform, DNA- or RNA-Seq, WES (+capture kit) or WGS (PCR-free or PCR+), paired- or single-end, read length, expected average coverage, somatic data, etc.
6. For tool errors, include the error stacktrace as well as the exact command.
7. For format issues, include the result of running ValidateSamFile for BAMs or ValidateVariants for VCFs.
8. For weird results, include an illustrative example, e.g. attach IGV screenshots according to Article#5484.
9. For a seeming variant that is uncalled, include results of following Article#1235.

#### ☞ Formatting tip!

Wrap blocks of code, error messages and BAM/VCF snippets--especially content with hashes (#)--with lines with three backticks ( ` ) each to make a code block as demonstrated here.

GATK 3.7 is here! Be sure to read the Version Highlights and optionally the full Release Notes.

# Does callset derived from HyplotyperCaller need run through VariantAnnotator for VQSR step?

Member

Hi,

I just run HyplotypeCaller on a dataset. For the same dataset, I have run through Unified genotyper and then directly subjected the raw vcf from UG to VQSR step without the help of VariantAnnotator before and get through VQSR without any problem. However, when I try to subject the raw callset derived from HyplotypeCaller directly to VQSR step, the VQSR module complained about it and error message is below:

...

#### ERROR MESSAGE: Bad input: Values for HaplotypeScore annotation not detected for ANY training variant in the input callset. VariantAnnotator may be used to add these annotations. See

So after HyplotypeCaller, the derived vcf file needs to run though VariantAnnotator? Since Unified genotyper derived callset does not need the help of VariantAnnotator (all annotations needed for VQSR are included after UG), it seems not the case for HyplotypeCaller? I can run through VariantAnnotator for HyplotypeCaller derived vcf file, just want to make sure if my understanding is correct?

Thanks and best

Mike

Tagged:

Hi Mike,

It depends what annotations you are trying to recalibrate with. It is possible that some of the annotations you want were not added by the HaplotypeCaller. In that case you will indeed need to add them with VariantAnnotator.

Please note that we no longer include HaplotypeScore in our recommendations for VQSR. This doe not mean you cannot use it, just that in our hands we have found it is not helpful.

Hi Mike,

It depends what annotations you are trying to recalibrate with. It is possible that some of the annotations you want were not added by the HaplotypeCaller. In that case you will indeed need to add them with VariantAnnotator.

Please note that we no longer include HaplotypeScore in our recommendations for VQSR. This doe not mean you cannot use it, just that in our hands we have found it is not helpful.

• Member

Thanks a lot for your prompt response, Geraldine! Mike

• Member

Hi, Geraldine:

Sorry, just realized that I used to use "-an MQ", which is now also eliminated from the documentation at URL: