The current GATK version is 3.7-0
Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Did you remember to?


1. Search using the upper-right search box, e.g. using the error message.
2. Try the latest version of tools.
3. Include tool and Java versions.
4. Tell us whether you are following GATK Best Practices.
5. Include relevant details, e.g. platform, DNA- or RNA-Seq, WES (+capture kit) or WGS (PCR-free or PCR+), paired- or single-end, read length, expected average coverage, somatic data, etc.
6. For tool errors, include the error stacktrace as well as the exact command.
7. For format issues, include the result of running ValidateSamFile for BAMs or ValidateVariants for VCFs.
8. For weird results, include an illustrative example, e.g. attach IGV screenshots according to Article#5484.
9. For a seeming variant that is uncalled, include results of following Article#1235.

Did we ask for a bug report?


Then follow instructions in Article#1894.

Formatting tip!


Surround blocks of code, error messages and BAM/VCF snippets--especially content with hashes (#)--with lines with three backticks ( ``` ) each to make a code block.
Powered by Vanilla. Made with Bootstrap.
Picard 2.9.0 is now available. Download and read release notes here.
GATK 3.7 is here! Be sure to read the Version Highlights and optionally the full Release Notes.

Default filters for UnifiedGenotyper

jcarbonelljcarbonell Member Posts: 5

Hi,

My question is: Is it possible to disable any of the default read filters in UnifiedGenotyper tool?

Concretely, i've been experiencing some problems with BadMateFilter. I work in a non-model species which has a relatively high fragmented assembly. Due to fragmentation I usuallly find reads with mate mapped to a different contig, which provokes a non negligible loss of callable sites.

Any idea??

Congratulations for you nice suite of tools and thanks in advance
Jose

Tagged:

Answers

  • Geraldine_VdAuweraGeraldine_VdAuwera Cambridge, MAMember, Administrator, Broadie Posts: 11,413 admin

    Unfortunately that's not possible; the filters are needed to prevent the UG from blowing up on problematic reads. Perhaps you can try getting rid of the mate information altogether?

    Geraldine Van der Auwera, PhD

Sign In or Register to comment.