The current GATK version is 3.7-0
Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Get notifications!


You can opt in to receive email notifications, for example when your questions get answered or when there are new announcements, by following the instructions given here.

Did you remember to?


1. Search using the upper-right search box, e.g. using the error message.
2. Try the latest version of tools.
3. Include tool and Java versions.
4. Tell us whether you are following GATK Best Practices.
5. Include relevant details, e.g. platform, DNA- or RNA-Seq, WES (+capture kit) or WGS (PCR-free or PCR+), paired- or single-end, read length, expected average coverage, somatic data, etc.
6. For tool errors, include the error stacktrace as well as the exact command.
7. For format issues, include the result of running ValidateSamFile for BAMs or ValidateVariants for VCFs.
8. For weird results, include an illustrative example, e.g. attach IGV screenshots according to Article#5484.
9. For a seeming variant that is uncalled, include results of following Article#1235.

Did we ask for a bug report?


Then follow instructions in Article#1894.

Formatting tip!


Wrap blocks of code, error messages and BAM/VCF snippets--especially content with hashes (#)--with lines with three backticks ( ``` ) each to make a code block as demonstrated here.

Jump to another community
Picard 2.9.0 is now available. Download and read release notes here.
GATK 3.7 is here! Be sure to read the Version Highlights and optionally the full Release Notes.

Adjusting priors for heterozygosity for pooled samples in UnifiedGenotyper

jdavilajdavila Member Posts: 4

Hi to all,

I am calling variants in a pooled sample of 3 human samples, using UnifiedGenotyper and a ploidy of 6 and I was wondering if it is necessary to adjust the heterozygosity rate (--heterozygosity) to be 0.003 instead of the default of 0.001, or if the model used in the pooled sample calling already takes this into account.Thanks a lot,

Jaime

Best Answers

Answers

  • jdavilajdavila Member Posts: 4

    Eric

    Sorry for not being more clear in my earlier post. I am running UnifiedGenotyper multi-sample calling on several samples (say 20). Each one of the samples is a pool of three individuals without barcoding or multiplexing, hence I am using ploidy of 6. Are you saying that even when I have pooled individuals in a sample I need not change the heterozygosity rate? I was thinking that since each "sample" is a combination of three individuals the chances of a heterozygous call go up by three.

    Thanks a lot for your detailed answer,

    Jaime

Sign In or Register to comment.