The current GATK version is 3.7-0
Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Get notifications!


You can opt in to receive email notifications, for example when your questions get answered or when there are new announcements, by following the instructions given here.

Did you remember to?


1. Search using the upper-right search box, e.g. using the error message.
2. Try the latest version of tools.
3. Include tool and Java versions.
4. Tell us whether you are following GATK Best Practices.
5. Include relevant details, e.g. platform, DNA- or RNA-Seq, WES (+capture kit) or WGS (PCR-free or PCR+), paired- or single-end, read length, expected average coverage, somatic data, etc.
6. For tool errors, include the error stacktrace as well as the exact command.
7. For format issues, include the result of running ValidateSamFile for BAMs or ValidateVariants for VCFs.
8. For weird results, include an illustrative example, e.g. attach IGV screenshots according to Article#5484.
9. For a seeming variant that is uncalled, include results of following Article#1235.

Did we ask for a bug report?


Then follow instructions in Article#1894.

Formatting tip!


Wrap blocks of code, error messages and BAM/VCF snippets--especially content with hashes (#)--with lines with three backticks ( ``` ) each to make a code block as demonstrated here.

Jump to another community
Picard 2.9.4 is now available. Download and read release notes here.
GATK 3.7 is here! Be sure to read the Version Highlights and optionally the full Release Notes.

Does GATK BaseRecalibrator work with solid Lifescope Bam files?

Does GATK BaseRecalibrator work with Bam files produces with the SOLID Lifescope mapper?

You show in the a base quality recalibration presentation that recalibration also should work on SOLID data. But you don't mention if it also works for Bam files produced with lifescope. BWA mapping quality is from 0-37 , Lifescope mapping quality is from 0 - 95.

I get an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException on the lifescope Bam files.

`##### ERROR ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ERROR stack trace

java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -92
at org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.baq.BAQ.calcEpsilon(BAQ.java:158)
at org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.baq.BAQ.hmm_glocal(BAQ.java:225)
at org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.baq.BAQ.calcBAQFromHMM(BAQ.java:542)
at org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.baq.BAQ.calcBAQFromHMM(BAQ.java:595)
at org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.baq.BAQ.calcBAQFromHMM(BAQ.java:530)
at org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.baq.BAQ.baqRead(BAQ.java:663)
at org.broadinstitute.sting.gatk.walkers.bqsr.BaseRecalibrator.calculateBAQArray(BaseRecalibrator.java:428)
at org.broadinstitute.sting.gatk.walkers.bqsr.BaseRecalibrator.map(BaseRecalibrator.java:243)
at org.broadinstitute.sting.gatk.walkers.bqsr.BaseRecalibrator.map(BaseRecalibrator.java:112)
at org.broadinstitute.sting.gatk.traversals.TraverseReadsNano$TraverseReadsMap.apply(TraverseReadsNano.java:203)
at org.broadinstitute.sting.gatk.traversals.TraverseReadsNano$TraverseReadsMap.apply(TraverseReadsNano.java:191)
at org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.nanoScheduler.NanoScheduler.executeSingleThreaded(NanoScheduler.java:248)
at org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.nanoScheduler.NanoScheduler.execute(NanoScheduler.java:219)
at org.broadinstitute.sting.gatk.traversals.TraverseReadsNano.traverse(TraverseReadsNano.java:91)
at org.broadinstitute.sting.gatk.traversals.TraverseReadsNano.traverse(TraverseReadsNano.java:55)
at org.broadinstitute.sting.gatk.executive.LinearMicroScheduler.execute(LinearMicroScheduler.java:83)
at org.broadinstitute.sting.gatk.GenomeAnalysisEngine.execute(GenomeAnalysisEngine.java:281)
at org.broadinstitute.sting.gatk.CommandLineExecutable.execute(CommandLineExecutable.java:113)
at org.broadinstitute.sting.commandline.CommandLineProgram.start(CommandLineProgram.java:237)
at org.broadinstitute.sting.commandline.CommandLineProgram.start(CommandLineProgram.java:147)
at org.broadinstitute.sting.gatk.CommandLineGATK.main(CommandLineGATK.java:91)

ERROR ----------------------------------------------`

Answers

  • Geraldine_VdAuweraGeraldine_VdAuwera Cambridge, MAMember, Administrator, Broadie

    Hi there,

    The error you're getting is unrelated to its origin, it's due to a bug that is fixed in the latest version of GATK. Just upgrade your version and it will work fine.

  • The version I am using is
    The Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) v2.3-9-ge5ebf34, Compiled 2013/01/11 22:43:14

    which is fairly recent. So there is already a newer 2.3.9 build online? Or will it be fixed in 2.4?

  • Geraldine_VdAuweraGeraldine_VdAuwera Cambridge, MAMember, Administrator, Broadie

    Oh that's weird, that is our latest version. Let me check if the fix is still pending.

  • Ok I am interested in the answer. To check for other problems I also ran Picard validate bam.
    I get a lot of NM tag missing errors:

    WARNING: Record 1, Read name 1212_1948_428, NM tag (nucleotide differences) is missing

    And just some mate related errors:

    ERROR: Record 20985168, Read name 164_312_583, Mate alignment does not match alignment start of mate
    ERROR: Record 20985168, Read name 164_312_583, Mate negative strand flag does not match read negative strand flag of mat

  • Geraldine_VdAuweraGeraldine_VdAuwera Cambridge, MAMember, Administrator, Broadie

    OK, we believe this is fixed in our current development version. The fix will be in the next release (2.4) which will be out next week.

  • LisaLattaruloLisaLattarulo San Diego, CAMember

    Hi - quick follow up @WimS. Did you ever figure out what do do with the all WARNING: ....NM tag (nucleotide differences) is missing? Did you have to fix these or did they run through anyhow? If you did fix them, how did you? I am currently running into this issue and haven't been able to find resolution yet. Thank you!!

Sign In or Register to comment.