The current GATK version is 3.7-0
Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04

#### Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

#### ☞ Did you remember to?

1. Search using the upper-right search box, e.g. using the error message.
3. Include tool and Java versions.
4. Tell us whether you are following GATK Best Practices.
5. Include relevant details, e.g. platform, DNA- or RNA-Seq, WES (+capture kit) or WGS (PCR-free or PCR+), paired- or single-end, read length, expected average coverage, somatic data, etc.
6. For tool errors, include the error stacktrace as well as the exact command.
7. For format issues, include the result of running ValidateSamFile for BAMs or ValidateVariants for VCFs.
8. For weird results, include an illustrative example, e.g. attach IGV screenshots according to Article#5484.
9. For a seeming variant that is uncalled, include results of following Article#1235.

#### ☞ Formatting tip!

Surround blocks of code, error messages and BAM/VCF snippets--especially content with hashes (#)--with lines with three backticks ( ` ) each to make a code block.
GATK 3.7 is here! Be sure to read the Version Highlights and optionally the full Release Notes.

# Is this expected that HaplotypCaller identified 40% more variants by 2.2.5 than 2.1.8

Member Posts: 18

Hi GATK team,

I recently downloaded GATK2.2.5 and re-analyzed a small part of my data which was analyzed by2.1.8 pipeline previously, following the same parameters. However I found the new pipeline identified 7247 variants (Q30) while 2.1.8 previously detected 5119. Fortunately, 5118 of the previous ones were recovered by 2.2.5 and 4845 of them were given the same genotypes for all samples. But I still want to know whether the previous version would indeed miss some data.

I checked your release notes, but it just claimed some performance issues from 2.1.* to 2.2.* for HC.

Best,
SK

Tagged:

Hi SK,

In v2.2 we fixed a number of bugs in HC that are not detailed in the release notes, maybe that's why you're seeing a difference -- but that does seem like a big difference. Have you looked at the "new/extra" calls to see if they have any distinguishing features?

Geraldine Van der Auwera, PhD

It's probably related to the bug fixes for the Exact model which are detailed in the release notes.

Eric Banks, PhD -- Director, Data Sciences and Data Engineering, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT

• Member Posts: 18
edited November 2012

Hi GATK developers,

After I compare them in details, I found the new pipeline splits most of the complex variants back to two independent SNPs, such as:

In 2.1.8 pipeline:

SCF1 343 . TCTATT ACTATC 1117.34 . .

In 2.2.5 pipeline:

SCF1 343 . T A 1121.23 . ...

SCF1 348 . T C 1121.23 . ...

Is this expected?

Best,
SK