The current GATK version is 3.7-0
Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04

#### Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

#### ☞ Did you remember to?

1. Search using the upper-right search box, e.g. using the error message.
3. Include tool and Java versions.
4. Tell us whether you are following GATK Best Practices.
5. Include relevant details, e.g. platform, DNA- or RNA-Seq, WES (+capture kit) or WGS (PCR-free or PCR+), paired- or single-end, read length, expected average coverage, somatic data, etc.
6. For tool errors, include the error stacktrace as well as the exact command.
7. For format issues, include the result of running ValidateSamFile for BAMs or ValidateVariants for VCFs.
8. For weird results, include an illustrative example, e.g. attach IGV screenshots according to Article#5484.
9. For a seeming variant that is uncalled, include results of following Article#1235.

#### ☞ Formatting tip!

Surround blocks of code, error messages and BAM/VCF snippets--especially content with hashes (#)--with lines with three backticks ( ` ) each to make a code block.
GATK 3.7 is here! Be sure to read the Version Highlights and optionally the full Release Notes.

# Integration test files

Member Posts: 96 ✭✭✭

Is there any where I can find the integration test file with the md5sum "45d97df6d291695b92668e8a55c54cd0", which is used in the DataProcessingPipelineTest class? Since my tests fail with another md5sum calculated I would be interested to know what the differences between the files are.

Tagged:

Better news: this is already on the todo list of one of our developers. I can't give you an ETA but I expect it will happen fairly soon.

Geraldine Van der Auwera, PhD

• Member Posts: 96 ✭✭✭

Never mind. I managed to run run the tests from the master-branch, so I can generate the files there and then find the problem in my devel-branch. Sorry for the bother.

• Member Posts: 96 ✭✭✭

As it turns out, the md5s were failing on the master branch as well. My guess is that this is due to me using a different bwa version, causing the header to look different. But right now I have note way to confirm that, so I would still be very happy if there was a way for me to access the file corresponding to the md5sums: 45d97df6d291695b92668e8a55c54cd0 and 9fca827ecc8436465b831bb6f879357a. Is this possible?

Hi Johan,

Unfortunately we don't have anything set up to share the test files at the moment, but I'll discuss it with the group to see if that's something we could do.

Geraldine Van der Auwera, PhD