It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Geraldine_VdAuwera
Posts: 2,239Administrator, GSA Official Member admin
We have sequenced at the Broad Institute and released to the 1000 Genomes Project the following datasets for the three members of the CEU trio (NA12878, NA12891 and NA12892):
This is better data to work with than the original DePristo et al. BAMs files, so we recommend you download and analyze these files if you are looking for complete, large-scale data sets to evaluate the GATK or other tools.
Here's the rough library properties of the BAMs:

These data files can be downloaded from the 1000 Genomes DCC
Here are the datasets we used in the GATK paper cited below.
DePristo M, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella K, Maguire J, Hartl C, Philippakis A, del Angel G, Rivas MA, Hanna M, McKenna A, Fennell T, Kernytsky A, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Gabriel S, Altshuler D and Daly, M (2011). A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nature Genetics. 43:491-498.
Some of the BAM and VCF files are currently hosted by the NCBI: ftp://ftp-trace.ncbi.nih.gov/1000genomes/ftp/technical/working/20101201_cg_NA12878/
FILTER field status-- targets used in the analysis of the exome capture dataPlease note that we have not collected the indel calls for the paper, as these are only used for filtering SNPs near indels. If you want to call accurate indels, please use the new GATK indel caller in the Unified Genotyper.
Both the GATK and the sequencing technologies have improved significantly since the analyses performed in this paper.
If you are conducting a review today, we would recommend that the newest version of the GATK, which performs much better than the version described in the paper. Moreover, we would also recommend one use the newest version of Crossbow as well, in case they have improved things. The GATK calls for NA12878 from the paper (above) will give one a good idea what a good call set looks like whole-genome or whole-exome.
The data sets used in the paper are no longer state-of-the-art. The WEx BAM is GAII data aligned with MAQ on hg18, but a state-of-the-art data set would use HiSeq and BWA on hg19. Even the 64x HiSeq WG data set is already more than one year old. For a better assessment, we would recommend you use a newer data set for these samples, if you have the capacity to generate it. This applies less to the WG NA12878 data, which is pretty good, but the NA12878 WEx from the paper is nearly 2 years old now and notably worse than our most recent data sets.
Obviously, this was an annoyance for us as well, as it would have been nice to use a state-of-the-art data set for the WEx. But we decided to freeze the data used for analysis to actually finish this paper.
If you want the raw, machine output for the data analyzed in the GATK framework paper, obtain the raw BAM files above and convert them from SAM to FASTQ using the Picard tool SamToFastq.
Geraldine Van der Auwera, PhD
Comments
Hi, From the 1000 Genome DCC link above, what is the difference between the set of NA12878 bam files by chromosome and the set containing just a single file?
By chromosome:
Single file:
Thanks, Angel
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like WTF •Hi Angel,
That's a question for the curators of the 1000 Genome DCC website -- they should be able to tell you what are the different files they offer for download.
Geraldine Van der Auwera, PhD
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like WTF •Should we be using Picard's RevertSam before SamToFastq when trying to convert the bam to fastq? Thanks!
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like WTF •That's a question for the Picard dev team -- they will be able to better tell you what their tools do.
Geraldine Van der Auwera, PhD
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like WTF •Hi. I was wondering if any fastq sequence file has been released for the data sets posted here. Preferably with seqence.index files. Thanks.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like WTF •Hi @charade,
I believe these are all provided as bams, but if you want you can revert them to fastq using Picard tools.
Geraldine Van der Auwera, PhD
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like WTF •well. That I know. But I need the meta information of the sequence, like how many submissions are there, are they from different libraries with different insert size etc. Could you refer me to anyone who might know the details. Thanks
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like WTF •Any meta information available on these datasets should be provided by the 1000 Genomes project web page, I suggest you ask there.
Geraldine Van der Auwera, PhD
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like WTF •